The Corner


Why It Was a Mistake for Salon to Run Its Pedophilia Piece

In response to I Missed This in November

Charles, I think you offer about as good and generous a defense of that article one could make. But I still have a basic problem with it. Ultimately, the piece follows exactly the strategy one would suggest to start the “important conversation” and then a campaign in favor of humanizing pedophilia. 

Here’s an interesting thought experiment. Replace pedophilia in the article with a desire to rape. Call it rapophilia. No doubt there are no small number of men out there who have a strong innate urge to forcibly rape people. They just can’t help it. It’s what they are into. No doubt some number of them never act on that urge and they struggle with their demon. 

How would that op-ed read? Would Salon publish it? Would readers be expected to sympathize with the author? 

I consider pedophilia the desire to rape children. Even when it is not violently forcible, I consider sex with children to be a kind of rape because children cannot offer anything like informed consent.  

You nod to the idea that social taboos have their place, but the main thrust of the essay is to attack the social stigma against pedophiles. I am hard pressed to see what good can come of that. For that reason alone — though I can think of others — I think Salon made a mistake running that piece.

No doubt it is a cruel fate to be born having a sexual desire for children.  But I cannot see how the net sum of suffering in this world would be lessened if we were to have a more accommodating and tolerant attitude toward pedophiles. I’m not a big fan of slippery-slope arguments, but this seems like one place where they apply. 

Taboos, like any bright and clear rule, will create winners and losers. That in itself is no argument against a taboo. Launching a campaign — and that’s what Salon was doing — to lighten the taboo against pedophilia is not, to my mind, commendable.

Most Popular


Kamala Harris Runs for Queen

I’m going to let you in on a secret about the 2020 presidential contest: Unless unforeseen circumstances lead to a true wave election, the legislative stakes will be extremely low. The odds are heavily stacked against Democrats’ retaking the Senate, and that means that even if a Democrat wins the White House, ... Read More
Energy & Environment

The Climate Trap for Democrats

The more the climate debate changes, the more it stays the same. Polls show that the public is worried about climate change, but that doesn’t mean that it is any more ready to bear any burden or pay any price to combat it. If President Donald Trump claws his way to victory again in Pennsylvania and the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

But Why Is Guatemala Hungry?

I really, really don’t want to be on the “Nicolas Kristof Wrote Something Dumb” beat, but, Jiminy Cricket! Kristof has taken a trip to Guatemala, with a young woman from Arizona State University in tow. “My annual win-a-trip journey,” he writes. Reporting from Guatemala, he discovers that many ... Read More

What We’ve Learned about Jussie Smollett

It’s been a few weeks since March 26, when all charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and the actor declared that his version of events had been proven correct. How’s that going? Smollett’s celebrity defenders have gone quiet. His publicists and lawyers are dodging reporters. The @StandwithJussie ... Read More