The Corner


Contra Tim Kaine’s Fantasy, the Catholic Church Isn’t Going to Change Its Teaching on Marriage

At last weekend’s Human Rights campaign national dinner, Democratic vice-presidential nominee Tim Kaine said he expects the Roman Catholic Church will change its centuries’-old understanding of marriage to include same-sex unions, in the same way that he himself did ten years ago.

Until 2005, Kaine was an opponent of legalizing same-sex marriage: “For a long time while I was battling for LGBT equality, I believed that marriage was something different.” But during Kaine’s stint as lieutenant governor of Virginia, when state lawmakers pushed a constitutional amendment to define marriage as between one man and one woman, pro-traditional-marriage arguments caused Kaine to pivot and support the legalization of same-sex marriage.

Kaine consistently describes himself as a “devout Catholic.” His pastor at a Catholic Church in Richmond agreed with this assessment, and the press often confers this label upon him as a matter of fact. Some commentators have branded him a “Pope Francis Catholic.”  Leaving aside the question — which I’ve considered previously at NRO – of whether one can be considered a “devout Catholic” while disagreeing with the Church on such fundamental issues as marriage and the right to life, consider Kaine’s blatant misunderstanding of his own faith when he asserts that the Church might alter its teaching on the nature of marriage. The very nature of Catholic teaching is precisely that it can’t “evolve,” but rather will remain unchanged despite the fluctuating winds of public opinion and policy.

Those who want Catholicism to join hand-in-hand with modernity in a long march toward “progress” might point to certain traditions that have changed during its 2,000-year history. What’s to stop its teachings on abortion and marriage from undergoing a similar change? Such an argument, however, ignores the distinction between a change in church culture and one in the “capital-T” Tradition of the Church, or its doctrines. Unlike, say, the U.S. Constitution, Catholic doctrine not only will not but cannot be altered​.

It’s one thing for Kaine to support the legalization of same-sex marriage and denigrate Trump for his supposed lack of concern for LGBT people — though this, too, might be worthy of scrutiny. It’s another for him to glibly predict the Catholic Church will soon change its doctrine to be in line with his own opinion, touting a false understanding of Catholic teaching to justify both his progressive stance and his devotion to the faith in doing so.

UPDATE: Bishop Francis X. DiLorenzo of the Catholic diocese of Richmond released a statement today reiterating the Church’s unchanging definition of marriage in the wake of Kaine’s comments. From the bishop’s statement:

More than a year after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on marriage, and despite recent statements from the campaign trail, the Catholic Church’s 2000-year-old teaching to the truth about what constitutes marriage remains unchanged and resolute. As Catholics, we believe, all humans warrant dignity and deserve love and respect, and unjust discrimination is always wrong. Our understanding of marriage, however, is a matter of justice and fidelity to our Creator’s original design. Marriage is the only institution uniting one man and one woman with each other and with any child who comes from their union. Redefining marriage furthers no one’s rights, least of all those of children, who should not purposely be deprived of the right to be nurtured and loved by a mother and a father.

Most Popular


It’s Time for Colin Kaepernick to Move On

Colin Kaepernick. Remember him? Below-average quarterback. Above-average poseur. Not “activist,” not really. Activists actually say stuff. Kaepernick almost never says anything. He’s like the Queen or most popes — you have to read the deep-background musings of supposed members of his inner circle to get ... Read More

What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More

Trump and the Black Vote

"Donald Trump is a racist, white supremacist, white nationalist. So are his supporters." Some version of that refrain is heard almost hourly somewhere in mainstream media. Democratic politicians seem to proclaim it more often than that. Listening only to the Left, you'd conclude that more than half a ... Read More

The Age of Miscalculation

On August 7, 1998, more than 200 people were killed in terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. Americans learned three names most of them never had heard before: Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden, and al-Qaeda. On August 20, 1998, President Bill Clinton ordered a ... Read More