The Corner

That Scandalous Archbishop

San Francisco is scandalized that the archbishop administering the Catholic Church locally intends to act like an archbishop administering the Catholic Church locally.

Archbishop Salvatore J. Cordileone—King Richard was not the only lion-hearted Catholic—is a San Diego native whose penitential task in this vale of tears is serving as the chief executive officer of the Catholic Church in the American city whose values are most hostile to it, at least in gonadal matters. The archbishop serves, among other things, as the chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Subcommittee for the Defense of Marriage, and is a vocal opponent of same-sex marriage.

The archdiocese intends to enforce rules that would require, among others, teachers in its schools to affirm Catholic doctrine on matters such as homosexuality and pornography. There is in reality rather less to this than the controversy suggests: The administrators of Catholic schools and institutions have shown no indication that they intend to police, for example, whether a science teacher quietly takes birth-control pills. What the Catholic Church is working to prevent is the propagation of moral positions at odds with its teachings in its own institutions by its own employees, the subversion of its mission from within. It is entirely within its rights to do so, up to and including dismissing teachers for public statements or public actions at odds with its doctrine. No one has a right to a job teaching at a Catholic school; if Debbie Wasserman Schultz should wake up tomorrow and decide that she believes very strongly that Rick Santorum should be the next president of the United States—and she is daft enough that anything is possible—then the Democratic National Committee would be well within its rights to fire her. (Conservatives pray it never does.) If a magus of the Church of Satan should suddenly adopt a worldview identical to that of Kathryn Jean Lopez, there would be rejoicing in heaven—but the Church of Satan would be within its rights to fire him.

Catholic sexual teaching, and Archbishop Cordileone’s insistence upon it, annoys a great many people in San Francisco. Among the annoyed is Mark Farrell of the board of supervisors, which is what San Francisco calls its city council. Farrell protests that the sexual conservatism of Archbishop Cordileone and his subordinates—one of whom recently returned to the tradition of having all-male altar servers—is at odds with the local culture, “an affront to the values most of the residents of this city, in good conscience, hold dear.” The Los Angeles Times reports that many San Franciscans find the policy “divisive.” Farrell and the Times are without any question absolutely correct: The city may be named after St. Francis, but all indicators are that most residents of the city hold the moral teachings of St. Francis’s to be an affront to their values.

Which is why we have a First Amendment.

The First Amendment is, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, a blessedly anti-democratic feature of our republic that says, in short: “You idiots don’t get a vote on this.” Protections for the free practice of religion, like protections for free speech, are unnecessary when what’s coming from the lectern or the printing press is received as unobjectionable. It is precisely at the moment when there is “an affront to the values most of the residents of this city”—or this country— hold that such protections are necessary.

Mark Farrell has his concerns, and if Archbishop Cordileone would only show a smidgen of flexibility in the matter at hand, he might suggest to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors where they can put those concerns.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Merciless Sympathy

Jussie Smollett’s phony hate-crime story could have been taken apart in 24 hours, except for one thing: Nobody wanted to be the first to call bullsh**. Who will bell the cat? Not the police, and I don’t blame them. Smollett is a vocal critic of President Donald Trump who checks two protected-category ... Read More

Questions for Those Who Believed Jussie Smollett

The “we reported the Jussie Smollett case responsibly” contention has been blasted to smithereens. Twitter accounts and headlines in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times reported as fact Jussie Smollett’s wildly implausible allegations, and many other journalists did so as ... Read More