The Corner


Scholarship or Activism?

Quite a few educators these days think of their jobs as platforms for their political activism. They’ve been hired to teach a subject, but that gives them the opportunity to shape young minds so they’ll support “good” political causes and view the world’s problems the same way they do. The Left has been at this for more than a century.

In today’s Martin Center article, Indiana University sociology professor Fabio Rojas pushes back against this idea. His ideal: scholarship first, activism second.

Rojas rejects the “scholars should be activists” concept for several reasons:

First, the “activist-scholar” model invites bias. If one believes that their political preferences must be reflected in research, we may begin to ignore evidence that our views may be erroneous. Second, we undermine the credibility of the academic enterprise when we erase the distinction between activist and scholar. When someone reads an article by a professor, they should believe that the professor is making the best argument given available methods and data, not the arguments that support their preferred side in a political debate.

Good points. More and more, Americans look askance at everything associated with “higher education” because it has been so poisoned by “progressive” politics.

But Rojas doesn’t think that there should be anything like a Wall of Separation between academia and activism. Professors often have good contributions to make to society. Of course they should be free to participate in whatever issues interest them — but never to let that shoulder aside their obligations as educators.

About a decade ago, Stanley Fish wrote a book entitled “Save the World on Your Own Time,” making the case for teaching your subject, not teaching equality or peace or justice or any other lofty goal. I think that Fish and Rojas are in agreement.

“Academia,” Rojas concludes, should be “a meeting of the minds, not a political battlefield.” Agreed — but what do we do about those who insist on using the classroom as a personal soapbox?

George Leef — George Leef is the director of research for the John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy.

Most Popular


Americans Are Royally Confused about Monarchy

Conventional wisdom regarding America’s relationship with royalty goes something like this: Americans have no time for monarchy as a political concept but can’t get enough of the British royal family. The American media’s round-the-clock coverage of the recent royal wedding certainly seems ample evidence of ... Read More

The Trump Rationale

Why exactly did nearly half the country vote for Donald Trump? Why also did the arguments of Never Trump Republicans and conservatives have marginal effect on voters? Despite vehement denunciations of the Trump candidacy from many pundits on the right and in the media, Trump nonetheless got about the same ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Collapse of the Collusion Narrative

It is now clear that Russian attempts at interference in the 2016 election, though somewhat outrageous, were ineffectual, unconnected with any particular party, a small effort given what a country of Russia’s resources and taste for political skullduggery and chicanery is capable of, and minor compared with the ... Read More
White House

Why the Left Won’t Call Anyone ‘Animals’

If you want to understand the moral sickness at the heart of leftism, read the first paragraph of the most recent column by Washington Post columnist E. J. Dionne: It’s never right to call other human beings ‘animals.’ It’s not something we should even have to debate. No matter how debased the behavior ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Trump’s Superpower

President Trump has a magic power. No, it isn’t the ability to engage in four-dimensional chess, or even to mystically connect with the “common man.” It’s simply this: He can make Democrats defend anything. Democrats have increasingly defined themselves by opposing anything Trump does. Trump, unlike ... Read More