The Corner


The Senate Results Are Not Unfair to the Democrats

This from a political-science professor has been retweeted thousands of times, and I’m seeing a lot of similar complaints as well:

This does not make any sense whatsoever as an indictment of the Senate, even setting aside that not all the races have been called yet.

The usual point about the Senate — or the Electoral College, or gerrymandering in the House — is that when Republicans win X percent of the popular vote, they typically win more than X percent of the available seats. (There’s a whole argument to be had about why things are set up this way, of course, but I won’t get into that here.) It is not that winning a majority of the vote should entitle you to an increase in seats no matter what the previous balance was.

Okay, you might say, but Republicans started out with a Senate majority and added to it, so the Senate still doesn’t reflect the popular vote. But this ignores that the entire Senate isn’t elected every two years, as happens in the House. Instead, senators serve six-year terms, with one-third of them facing reelection every two years — and the Democrats had a good year in 2012, which forced them to defend a lot of seats yesterday in states where Republicans have a chance. Of the 35 seats that were up for election (including two special elections), 26 are currently held by Democrats (including independents who caucus with the Democrats).

If you compare the percentage of yesterday’s popular vote with the percentage of seats won last night, you actually reach an uncomfortable conclusion: While Democrats won 55 percent of the popular vote, even losing three seats they’ll get 66 percent of the ones up for grabs (26 minus 3, divided by 35).

This doesn’t undermine the general point that the Senate is undemocratic — it’s designed to be — but perhaps this election isn’t the best example of its bad effects on Democrats.

Most Popular


White Cats and Black Swans

Making a film of Cats is a bold endeavor — it is a musical with no real plot, based on T. S. Eliot’s idea of child-appropriate poems, and old Tom was a strange cat indeed. Casting Idris Elba as the criminal cat Macavity seems almost inevitable — he has always made a great gangster — but I think there was ... Read More

Who Is Boris Johnson?

By next week at this time, Boris Johnson will be prime minister of the United Kingdom. Not since Margaret Thatcher has such an outsized personality resided in Number 10 Downing Street. Not since Winston Churchill has such a wit presided over Her Majesty’s Government. Wit is actually the chief reason for ... Read More
Energy & Environment

Ohio Bans ‘Nature Rights’

Finally! After voters in Toledo granted "rights" to Lake Erie -- in a special election, it should be noted, with minuscule turnout -- Ohio has outlawed the enforcement of "nature rights" in a budget bill signed by the governor. From the legislation: Sec. 2305.011...[Definitions omitted] (B) Nature or any ... Read More
Health Care

The Puzzling Problem of Vaping

San Francisco -- A 29-story office building at 123 Mission Street illustrates the policy puzzles that fester because of these facts: For centuries, tobacco has been a widely used, legal consumer good that does serious and often lethal harm when used as it is intended to be used. And its harmfulness has been a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Ten Questions for the ‘Squad’

Democratic infighting reached a fever pitch last week with bickering and personal attacks between members of the “Squad” and other House Democrats. During that period, Squad members Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley mostly avoided doing interviews. However, that all ... Read More