The Corner


The Senate Results Are Not Unfair to the Democrats

This from a political-science professor has been retweeted thousands of times, and I’m seeing a lot of similar complaints as well:

This does not make any sense whatsoever as an indictment of the Senate, even setting aside that not all the races have been called yet.

The usual point about the Senate — or the Electoral College, or gerrymandering in the House — is that when Republicans win X percent of the popular vote, they typically win more than X percent of the available seats. (There’s a whole argument to be had about why things are set up this way, of course, but I won’t get into that here.) It is not that winning a majority of the vote should entitle you to an increase in seats no matter what the previous balance was.

Okay, you might say, but Republicans started out with a Senate majority and added to it, so the Senate still doesn’t reflect the popular vote. But this ignores that the entire Senate isn’t elected every two years, as happens in the House. Instead, senators serve six-year terms, with one-third of them facing reelection every two years — and the Democrats had a good year in 2012, which forced them to defend a lot of seats yesterday in states where Republicans have a chance. Of the 35 seats that were up for election (including two special elections), 26 are currently held by Democrats (including independents who caucus with the Democrats).

If you compare the percentage of yesterday’s popular vote with the percentage of seats won last night, you actually reach an uncomfortable conclusion: While Democrats won 55 percent of the popular vote, even losing three seats they’ll get 66 percent of the ones up for grabs (26 minus 3, divided by 35).

This doesn’t undermine the general point that the Senate is undemocratic — it’s designed to be — but perhaps this election isn’t the best example of its bad effects on Democrats.

Most Popular


Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More

Democrats Think They Can Win without You

A  few days ago, Ericka Anderson, an old friend of National Review, popped up in the pages of the New York Times lamenting that “the Democratic presidential field neglects abundant pools of potential Democrat converts, leaving persuadable audiences — like independents and Trump-averse, anti-abortion ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More