The Corner

A Senate Trio Takes on Social Security Reform

On Capitol Hill, a maverick is stirring tea.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, one of the upper chamber’s leading dealmakers, is cosponsoring Social Security reform legislation with freshmen senators Rand Paul (Ky.) and Mike Lee (Utah), two vocal members of the Tea Party Caucus.

At a press conference this morning, the trio detailed their plan, the “Social Security Solvency and Sustainability Act.” The package would gradually raise the retirement age to 70 by 2032 and cut benefits for the wealthy beginning in 2018.

Graham joked that he has been attempting to fix Social Security since 2003, and held up a cover story from Congressional Quarterly from 2005, which praised him for taking on the third rail of American politics. That was six years ago, he said, and he doesn’t want to be talking about the same thing six years from now.

Graham then posed a question to himself. “Why the three of us?” he asked, swiveling his head on the dais. “These are the only guys that I could find. And I’m the only guy that they could find. It’s not like we auditioned a bunch of people and we just settled on the three of us. There is a real reluctance by Republicans and Democrats to talk about what I think is the easiest of the entitlements to save.”

As President Obama prepares to address Medicare and Medicaid in speech later today, the three Republicans argued that Social Security must be promptly addressed. “If the president today would put entitlement reform on the table, we intend to work with him, and anyone else,” Graham said. “I can tell you that Social Security is a meaningful program that is going to fail unless we do something.” But if Obama proposes tax increases to deal with entitlements, the South Carolinian warned that it will “not get the votes.”

Paul, who in the past has mentioned private accounts as a possible solution, chuckled when a reporter asked whether he has compromised with this plan. “Truly, at heart, I am a moderate,” he said, to laughs. “No, I am like Senator Graham. I still believe in the idea . . . This has to be done to fix the system. Senator Graham is exactly right. Right now, there are not enough votes for privatization. And there are definitely not the votes for raising taxes.”

Robert Costa — Robert Costa is National Review's Washington editor and a CNBC political analyst. He manages NR's Capitol Hill bureau and covers the White House, Congress, and national campaigns. ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More

Political Theatrics

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including all you whippersnappers under the age of 50), I’m writing this from somewhere over the Atlantic. At least I hope that’s ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More