The Corner

Serious Question for Amnesty Backers

The president has pledged to start pushing his immigration plan in Congress this month. Whatever the details, the outlines are known to everyone — amnesty for most illegal immigrants plus increases in future immigration (in the form of guestworkers or regular immigrants or both), in exchange for promises of future enforcement, such as mandatory E-Verify and the like.

Following up on my piece on the home page today, I’d like to ask conservative supporters of the president’s immigration stance one question: Do they actually believe the Obama administration will enforce the immigration laws once the illegals already here have been legalized? If so, what is your basis for that belief? And if not, how can you support a deal that exchanges amnesty for future promises of enforcement?

One reply I can imagine is that the increases in future immigration will effectively eliminate any numerical caps, so that everyone who wants to come will be able to do so. In other words, once immigration is unlimited, there’s really no longer any such thing as illegal immigration, and so no need for immigration enforcement. That’s a stance that libertarian purists can take, but is that the stance of any politically relevant Republican supporters of the president’s immigration approach?

Alternatively, some might argue that illegal immigration is over, so we’ve got nothing to lose. In that scenario, immigration enforcement has been rendered moot, because there is no new illegal immigration. But even the Pew report that everyone points to on this shows there was net immigration from Mexico in 2005–2010 (the report engineered the result of no net immigration from Mexico — same number leaving as arriving — by including U.S.-born kids in Mexican immigrant families in the departure figures). What’s more, there’s a whole world of potential illegal aliens beyond Mexico — Central Americans, for instance, now account for most apprehensions in South Texas.

Maybe there’s some other rationale I’m not thinking of. In any case, the question has to be the starting point for Grover Norquist, Richard Land, Lindsey Graham, Sean Hannity, and others on the right backing the president on immigration: Do you really believe that Obama will enforce immigration law any more after the amnesty than before?

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Omnibus Disgrace

The omnibus spending bill was crafted in secret and will be passed under pressure; raises discretionary spending as the national debt grows; and fails to deliver on any major GOP priorities except increased defense spending. What might turn out to be the signature achievement of unified Republican government this ... Read More

Thursday Links

It's William Shatner's birthday: Here he is in 1978 'singing' Rocket Man, plus a Star Trek/Monty Python mashup. Sold: Isaac Newton’s Notes on the Philosopher’s Stone. It was a long time before anyone admitted that he was interested in alchemy. High-tech forgery: Computer-generated 'Rembrandt' ... Read More

Korea: A Deadly Question

Olympic Games often have political significance, as in 1936 and as in the Olympics just past -- the Winter Games in Pyeongchang, South Korea. Those Games seemed as much political as athletic. I talk about this with Michael Breen on my latest Q&A. Breen is one of our best Korea-watchers, one of our soundest ... Read More
Film & TV

Superannuated ‘Idol’

In the pilot episode of Fox’s American Idol, Simon Cowell defined the show’s thesis: “We are going to tell people who cannot sing and have no talent that they have no talent. And that never makes you popular.” The show’s producers and its three judges -- Cowell, Paula Abdul, and Randy Jackson -- kept ... Read More