The Corner

Seven Billion People? No Problem

The United Nations has marked October 31, 2011, as the day the global population scale will tip the 7 billion mark. But you won’t feel the weight of the world shift just yet. The U.S. Census Bureau’s World Population Clock has “Baby 7 Billion” arriving closer to March 1, 2012.

So how should we feel about our world population reaching 7 billion?

We should not be fearful in the least. People are not the problem and have never been demonstrated as such. 

The fearmongering over the issue of so-called overpopulation has been well documented. Paul Ehrlich’s famously inaccurate book The Population Bomb (1969) helped ignite that fear with whopper declarations of doom like this: “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”

Here we are in 2011, and the earth’s population has doubled since Ehrlich and others started frantically ringing the alarm bell in the late 1960s. And while all is not well, it is far from catastrophic. England and quite few other places are still around, and immigration trends find people moving there of their own free will. 

At 7 billion, there is still plenty room on our terrestrial ball. As both Time and the Guardian report, all 7 billion of us could head on over to Texas and collectively dwell there with no more density than we find in New York City, where a lot of very sophisticated people live. They seem to find the city quite pleasant.

To make it even more interesting, all of us 7 billion folks could move to Rhode Island and have 6.4 square feet per person. That’s not enough room to run around and really be happy, but it is enough for everyone to carefully do some jumping jacks, if they pleased. The rest of this great world could be used for either preservation or production, depending on whether you’re a Democrat or Republican. 

And there is still plenty of food. The Guardian article linked above explains that we are already producing enough grain globally to feed 10 billion people a vegetarian diet. Currently half of the food produced in the world is either intentionally discarded or allowed to waste.

Overpopulation worriers should also know that most of the world is not reproducing anyway. According to a brand new report conducted cooperatively by six different universities, the average woman in the developed world only produces 1.66 children in her lifetime, well below the replacement level of 2.1. In fact, in more than 75 countries around the world (42 percent of the world’s population), fertility is below the replacement level needed to maintain current work levels as well as support and care for aging parents. Countries like Japan are now experiencing economic stagnation due to below-replacement fertility levels dating back to the 1970s. China achieved this in the early 1990s. If a nation wants to maintain its economic strength, it must produce enough people to become the next generations of workers, creators, investors, and consumers. Those types of people start out as babies and many nations are not producing enough of them.

The evidence is clear: People are not problems. Not even 7 billion of them.

— Glenn T. Stanton is the director of family formation studies at Focus on the Family and a research fellow at the Institute of Marriage and Family. He is also author of the recent books Secure Daughters, Confident Sons: How Parents Guide Their Children into Authentic Masculinity and Femininity and The Ring Makes All the Difference: The Hidden Consequences of Cohabitation and the Strong Benefits of Marriage.

Most Popular

Media

‘Undiagnosed Sociopath’

As we abandon moral language for clinical language, we run into technical difficulties. Writing in the New York Times, Thomas Friedman describes the 2020 presidential election as one that may be a contest between “a self-proclaimed socialist and an undiagnosed sociopath.” There is no such thing as an ... Read More
Media

‘Undiagnosed Sociopath’

As we abandon moral language for clinical language, we run into technical difficulties. Writing in the New York Times, Thomas Friedman describes the 2020 presidential election as one that may be a contest between “a self-proclaimed socialist and an undiagnosed sociopath.” There is no such thing as an ... Read More
Elections

Bernie Sanders Is a Moral Monster

Bernie Sanders complains that some criticism of the late Cuban dictator Fidel Castro is “unfair.” The Castro government lined up political dissidents and shot them. It tortured them. It weaponized the medical profession to torture and deform its critics. Its campaign of murder was extraordinary, its ... Read More
Elections

Bernie Sanders Is a Moral Monster

Bernie Sanders complains that some criticism of the late Cuban dictator Fidel Castro is “unfair.” The Castro government lined up political dissidents and shot them. It tortured them. It weaponized the medical profession to torture and deform its critics. Its campaign of murder was extraordinary, its ... Read More
Elections

A Bad Night for Democrats

The CBS-moderated debate on Tuesday was bad. The topic choices were bad: We heard yet another litigation of barely different visions of never-gonna-pass health-care policy an hour before we heard a question about coronavirus and pandemics. The moderation was bad: Bernie was attacked by five candidates ... Read More
Elections

A Bad Night for Democrats

The CBS-moderated debate on Tuesday was bad. The topic choices were bad: We heard yet another litigation of barely different visions of never-gonna-pass health-care policy an hour before we heard a question about coronavirus and pandemics. The moderation was bad: Bernie was attacked by five candidates ... Read More