The Corner

Economy & Business

Should Corporations Be Politically Active?

Since the Parkland high school shooting, it has been striking to watch corporations cut ties with the NRA. A few examples: United, Delta, and several rental car companies will no longer offer discounts to the NRA and its members. And the First National Bank of Omaha stopped offering an credit card co-branded with the NRA.

This followed protests from CEOs after the Trump administration’s decision to exit the Paris climate accord, CEO resignations from business councils following President Trump’s shameful response to the Charlottesville protests, tech titans speaking out on DACA, and more.

How to make sense of this? Shouldn’t firms stick to maximizing profits and shareholder value? I address these questions in my latest Bloomberg column.

Let’s be clear that a lot of this corporate behavior is self-interested. It’s hardly surprising that many companies have defended socially liberal causes that are also popular among millennials and the college educated: they want workers and a loyal customer base.

It surely says something about the tribalism that increasingly defines American life. I can’t imagine why anyone would care if their car rental company has chosen the “right” side of the latest controversy. I’ll bluntly say that for most controversies, they shouldn’t. But many seem to, which strikes me as unhealthy.

Does some of it represent long-term thinking from corporate America? If you think the president’s response to Charlottesville risked chipping away at social stability, then speaking out against it could be viewed as strengthening the country’s future. (Which is, of course, in the interest of business.)

If we’re going to have politically active corporations, I wish more of them focused their action on the long term — specifically, on strengthening the post-war liberal order — and less on the day’s headlines. Free trade, a strong commitment to democracy, and strong institutions have helped create decades of prosperity. Many political leaders today, including the president and his administration, seem not to understand this. Corporate leaders, who depend on this system, should be the first to defend it.

You can find my full argument in Bloomberg. Your comments, as always, are very welcome.

Most Popular


Krauthammer’s Take on Life

Dear Reader (And members of the Remnant everywhere), My plan was to do something new this week: Write a “news”letter in which the number and ratio of consonants to vowels in each word advanced in accordance with the Fibonacci sequence until, like a pointillist painting, seen from afar this “news”letter ... Read More
PC Culture

When PC Comes Back to Bite You

Political correctness run amok is a popular topic on the right these days. Indeed, the conservative bookshelf is chock full of best-sellers devoted to the topic. Subject matters vary. One may focus on the hypocrisy of campus speech codes, another on the revisionist attempt to indict our founding fathers, yet ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Charles Krauthammer, R.I.P.

It’s not often that the loss of an opinion writer can be said to be a loss for the country, but that is true of Charles Krauthammer, the Pulitzer Prize–winning columnist who died yesterday. In a fractured media environment where almost no one commands universal respect, where crudity of expression and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Time Stands by Misleading Cover Photo

Time magazine on Friday defended its decision to feature a photo of a crying toddler who was never separated from her mother on the cover of its July issue detailing family separations at the border. “The June 12 photograph of the 2-year-old Honduran girl became the most visible symbol of the ongoing ... Read More