The Corner

Science & Tech

Should We Break Up Big Tech?

There appears to be a bipartisan urge to do something about Google, Facebook, Amazon, et al. I wrote earlier about the disturbing accretion of information in Google and Facebook, and these days, more than ever, information is power. President Trump is obviously no fan of Amazon. The Murdoch family and Robert Thomson, the CEO of News Corp., have repeatedly ripped Google and Facebook for putting content providers out of business and for invasion of privacy. What to do about the tech giants, though? I can’t think of any proposed solution that would comport with our free-market economics.

On the other hand, companies have been broken up in the past. In retrospect, the 1982 breakup of AT&T worked out pretty well, unleashing a wave of innovation and competition in telecommunications, at great benefit to the consumer. Could the consumer gain by breaking up some of the tech giants? Is not Google effectively a monopoly? Monopoly power and its pernicious effects are not the goal of free-market economics, but then again monopolies usually are created and/or sustained by government favoritism, as was the case with AT&T. Google became a monopoly because it offered a superior product.

From the left we now have a breathtakingly broad proposal by Senator Elizabeth Warren to break up Big Tech. Warren would more or less bring down the mighty Hammer of Thor on these companies. As Dylan Byers of NBC News put it in his newsletter this morning, Warren’s audacious plan would “break up Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google by reversing their major acquisitions — including Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram and WhatsApp, Amazon’s acquisition of Whole Foods and Google’s acquisition of Waze.” It would “block companies from participating in the marketplaces they provide — meaning Amazon could not sell its own goods via Amazon Prime, and Apple could not distribute its own apps in the App Store.” And Big Tech would also “be prohibited from sharing user data with third parties,” which would destroy the business model of Google and Facebook.

Warren’s plan, Byers writes, is so far out that Silicon Valley could potentially be left without a political home and simply sit out the next presidential election. Normally conservatives would unanimously and loudly denounce such an outrageous incursion into the free market, but this time I wonder whether some on the right might at least agree with the diagnosis, if not the cure.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More