The Corner

Sistani For Nobel?

I don’t know about the rest of you folks, but some pretty angry emails have reached me about this suggestion, which was included in today’s edition of NRO’s new weekly wrap-up of the news of the week. Included in these, one emailer has pasted a response by Hugh Fitzgerald (via Robert Spencer at Dhimmi Watch), to a the same suggestion recently made by Tom Friedman of the NYTimes.

Fitzgerald notes that Sistani’s website, in its discussion of Islamic law, outlines a list of things that are najlis (meaning unclean). The list is interesting, and includes kafir (meaning those who do not accept Islam) in a group that also includes the following: urine, feces, semen, dead bodies, blood, dogs, pigs, alcoholic liquors, and “the sweat of an animal who persistently eats najasat” [i.e., unclean things].

I checked Sistani’s website, and Fitzgerald is substantially correct. Sistani actually includes the following in his definition of kafir:

An infidel i.e. a person who does not believe in Allah and His Oneness, is najis. Similarly, Ghulat who believe in any of the holy twelve Imams as God, or that they are incarnations of God, and Khawarij and Nawasib who express enmity towards th e holy Imams, are also najis. And similar is the case of those who deny Prophethood, or any of the necessary laws of Islam, like, namaz and fasting, which are believed by the Muslims as a part of Islam, and which they also know as such.

As regards the people of the Book (i.e. the Jews and the Christians) who do not accept the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad bin Abdullah (Peace be upon him and his progeny), they are commonly considered najis, but it is not improbable that they are Pak. [Pak is defined as clean, the opposite of najis] However, it is better to avoid them….

The entire body of a Kafir, including his hair and nails, and all liquid substances of his body, are najis. …

Given modern standards for the Nobel prize, this coarse view of humanity hardly puts Sistani out of contention. Regrettably, holding such beliefs also leaves any Muslim easily eligible for the modern designation of “moderate.” In any event, while I’m glad Sistani has criticized the rioting, it is a sad reflection of where we’re at that mere criticism of the patently atrocious should be the occasion of high praise. I respectfully disagree that the world would be a better place if Sistani were deemed Nobel material.

Most Popular


What Do Republican Voters Want?

The latest entry in the post-Trump conservatism sweepstakes was Marco Rubio’s speech at the Catholic University of America in early November. The Florida senator made the case for a “common-good capitalism” that looks on markets in the light of Catholic social thought. “We must remember that our nation ... Read More
White House

Impeachment Woes and DACA Throes

This excerpt is from episode 176 of The Editors. Charlie: Yesterday was the day on which the rain stopped and the sun hid behind the clouds and the eyes of the nation turned in unison toward Capitol Hill for the first day of public hearings in the impeachment of Donald Trump. The results of that first day were ... Read More

The Houellebecqian Moment

We are living in the imagination of Michel Houellebecq. The bête noire of French literature has spent decades deploring the erosion of Western mores that he believes resulted from the sexual revolution of the 1960s. His last novel, Submission, revolved around the election of a theocratic Muslim to the French ... Read More

‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More