The Corner

Politics & Policy

Snuffing the IPAB and CFPB Technocracy

It is clear to me that progressives want to dispatch constitutional limited governance and replace it with a democratically unaccountable technocracy.

Two super-agencies attest to that desire. First is the Independent Payment Advisory Board, which has powers over Medicare cost control that exceed those of Congress, the president, and the courts. It is also tailor-made to become a medical-rationing death panel.

IPAB controversies are germane to issues about which I write. But I was unaware of the breathtaking unaccountability of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which is independent of congressional funding and true oversight.

With the court victory allowing Mick Mulvaney to remain as interim director, the deconstruction of that technocratic high castle has begun.

Meanwhile, Representative Phil Roe (R., Texas) is leading a bipartisan push to repeal IPAB that appears to have a pretty good shot at passing.

None of this would be happening if Hillary Clinton were POTUS.

Whatever one thinks about President Trump’s tumultuous presidency, he will not be pushing to further empower Washington’s bureaucrats. Indeed, one of his more salutary legacies could be snuffing the planned Brussels-style technocracy before it was fully established.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More