The Corner

A Sociological Look at Modern Dating

Having just published a book about modern American ways of seeking intimate and durable personal relationships, I read with great interest Nick Paumgarten’s “Looking for Someone” in the July 4 New Yorker. While my book (entitled Extravagant Expectations: New Ways to Find Romantic Love in America) is not limited to a discussion of Internet dating, I share his interest in the question whether or not Internet personals help or hinder the objectives pursued. I looked at one such venue (match.com), as well as printed “personals” in various publications and numerous self-help or “relationship books” seeking to enlighten their readers about the best ways to find a compatible partner or mate.

As a sociologist, I was most interested in the connections between the individual needs and aspirations these advertisements reflect and the social-cultural influences likely to have shaped them. I was especially interested in the human qualities most highly valued by those looking for a long-term partner.

I came to the conclusion that the seamless compatibility pursued by the experts (and those they seek to help) is a fantasy not altogether different from the romantic yearnings of the past, which found expression in many novels. I was especially struck by the characteristic American disposition to embrace conflicting values and desires in the course of “looking for someone,” and especially the unstated belief that all good things are compatible. It is an attitude that does not bode well for the compromises and adjustments all durable personal relationships require. American culture has inculcated the belief that we all are unique individuals with inexhaustible potential for growth, creativity, and self-expression, and that these attributes need not conflict with the establishment and maintenance of personal or communal bonds. Likewise, the often-expressed pursuit of new experiences (or “openness to new experiences”) does not easily coexist with the quest for stability and security. Many Americans are seeking romantic bonds, but in a highly pragmatic or rational manner.

Like the author of the article here discussed, I also found that while Americans wish to maximize their choices and options, the abundance of such choices — or their seeming abundance — in the marketplace of personal relationships creates new problems and obstacles for self-fulfillment.

Most of us probably agree that in traditional societies, personal fulfillment was not a high priority in mate selection, which used to be governed by many restraints and social pressures. At the same time, it appears that modernity, freedom, individualism, and the pursuit of happiness have created new difficulties and unintended consequences we have yet to better understand and master.

— Paul Hollander, author or editor of 15 books, is professor emeritus of sociology at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and associate at the Davis Center of Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University.

Paul Hollander — Mr. Hollander was a professor of sociology at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and an associate of the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University. His most recent book is From Benito Mussolini to Hugo Chavez: Intellectuals and a Century of Political Hero Worship.

Most Popular

White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More
Education

An Idea for Student Loans: Get Rid of Them

Here is a three-part plan for something practical the federal government could do to relieve college-loan debt. Step 1: The federal government should stop making college loans itself and cease guaranteeing any such loans. Step 2: It should prohibit educational lending by federally regulated financial institutions ... Read More
White House

The Problem with the Mueller Report

So much for collusion. The media conversation has now officially moved on from the obsession of the last two years to obstruction of justice. That’s because the first volume of the voluminous Mueller report, the half devoted to what was supposed to be the underlying crime of a Trump conspiracy with Russia, ... Read More
Sports

Screw York Yankees

You are dead to me. You are a collection of Fredos. The cock has crowed, you pathetic sniveling jerks. The team I have rooted for since 1965, when I first visited the House that Ruth Built, where I hawked peanuts and ice cream a lifetime ago, watched countless games (Guidry striking out 18!), has gotten so ... Read More
White House

MoveOn.GOP?

Some of you will be familiar with a lefty, partisan Democratic organization called MoveOn, formerly MoveOn.Org. It was founded during an investigation into President Bill Clinton’s shenanigans (which were not, Democratic mythology notwithstanding, strictly sexual in nature) and argued that it was time for the ... Read More