The Corner

Sotloff Family Spokesman: Obama Admin Never ‘Gave Us the Cooperation We Need’

The spokesman for the family of Steven Sotloff, the second American journalist behead by the Islamic State, revealed new details on CNN about Sotloff’s capture as well as the family’s disappointment in the Obama administration’s handling of the entire situation.

Barak Barfi, who is also a fellow at the New American Foundation, told Anderson Cooper that “so-called moderate rebels” in Syria established a fake checkpoint to capture Sotloff on the Syrian border, and eventually sold him to the Islamic State for $25,000 to $50,000, according to their sources in the region. Sotloff was falsely believed to have been involved in the bombing of a hospital.

Since Sotloff’s beheading, the administration “made a number of inaccurate statements” about its work with the family, as well as the family of James Foley, who was also killed by the militant group, Barfi said. He indicated that if the administration continues to offer a misleading representation and leaks about the situation, the family will speak out.

“We know that the intelligence community and the White House are enmeshed in a larger game of bureaucratic infighting and Jim [Foley] and Steve are pawns in that game and that’s not fair,” Barfi said. “We do not believe they gave us the cooperation we need.”​

“The administration could have done more, they could have helped us, they could have seen them through,” he added.

Via BuzzFeed.

Most Popular

White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More