The Corner

Speaking of Washpost Bias

We have this, from Dana Milbank this morning: “As Bush and Kerry responded with dignified statements of unity against Osama bin Laden, the two campaigns struggled to game out their reactions, and to figure out how such a surreal event — the feared, ghostly image returning to Americans’ TV screens after a long absence — would alter Tuesday’s outcome….But in an election as close as this one is, even minor influences can have some impact. That concern was evident in the reaction to the tape’s broadcast yesterday — first an unusual silence, then hurried meetings and, finally, cautious statements.

Kerry went first. ‘Let me make it clear, crystal clear: As Americans, we are absolutely united in our determination to hunt down and destroy Osama bin Laden and the terrorists,’ he said.”

NO. THAT IS NOT HOW IT HAPPENED. As noted in The Corner yesterday, John Kerry’s first instinct was not caution. It was political attack.

And, a friend reading that piece comments: “Isn’t it odd that Milbank’s analysis concludes the tape will have little impact on the outcome? Watching the talking heads on cable last night, there was virtual unanimity that the tape — and especially the very different reactions to it — will help Bush.”

So why would Milbank conclude otherwise, completely contrary to both conventional wisdom and political common sense? Oh, I don’t know, could it be that he knows that to hhave people believe that the tape is, but a nuisance aside, with little real-world consequences, would help Kerry. Oh, to think such a thing…

But if the reactions weren’t that different — as Milbank would have us believe — Kerry suffers less. Hmmmm. Could it be? No, no, how could I even think such a thing…?

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The McCabe Firing

I found this run-down over at Lawfare (agnostic on the merits, but rightfully harsh about Trump’s public dumping on McCabe) helpful, especially this section on the professionals who recommended his dismissal: The FBI takes telling the truth extremely seriously: “lack of candor” from employees is a ... Read More
Law & the Courts

One More Point on McCabe . . .

One point to add to Jonathan Turley’s column about Andrew McCabe, and the glaring double standard of whether an FBI official will face obstruction-of-justice charges if he’s caught lying to an FBI internal investigation. In 2015, McCabe's wife Jill ran for a state senate seat in Virginia and received ... Read More
Politics & Policy

‘We Will Reduce Abortion’

Conor Lamb’s success has revived interest in “I’m personally opposed, but.” It’s a rhetorical convention — a cliché, really — that many Catholic Democrats have resorted to ever since Mario Cuomo popularized it with his speech at Notre Dame in 1984, as Alexandra DeSanctis explained a few days ... Read More


In a recent issue, we published a piece on Dante Della Terza, the great Dante scholar at Harvard (now in his nineties). Today, we have an expanded version on the homepage. After the magazine piece was published, I heard from Mark Helprin, the novelist, military analyst, and political writer. I had no idea he had ... Read More

The Pope Francis Challenge

An unforced error from a Vatican communications office the other day drove me a little something like crazy. The nature of the unforced error is that it is wholly unnecessary and typically distracting. And so it was. Days before, as the fifth anniversary of Pope Francis’s election as pope was approaching, a ... Read More