The Corner

Stem Cells

In addition to voting on the bill to provide federal funding for research that kills human embryos, Congress is voting on whether to fund research into ways of deriving pluripotent stem cells without killing human embryos. The Senate has been expected to pass this second piece of legislation with substantial Democratic support. But now Mike Castle, the Republican sponsor of the House version of the embryo-killing bill, is urging his colleagues to vote against funding those alternatives (see the e-mail below).

Castle argues that the alternative methods of derivation are “highly speculative.” But the lines of research he favors are speculative, too, although there has been more time to develop them. He says that some of the alternatives have been “deemed unethical by the President’s own Bioethics Council and . . . may violate current law because embryos will be destroyed with federal dollars.” These claims are untrue. Members of the council have raised concerns about some of the alternatives, but the council has not called any of them unethical. Members were concerned that some alternatives require the donation of eggs and that women could be exploited in the process. They raise the exact same concerns about research cloning, which Castle supports. None of the alternatives involve the destruction of human embryos–athough the notion that Castle sincerely objects to this possibility is laughable.

Castle says that the bill “takes focus away from advancing cures through federally funded embryonic stem cell research from excess IVF embryos.” But why should the focus be there, if cures can be found in less ethically troublesome ways? Castle isn’t saying that he wants funding for his preferred kind of research in addition to funding for the alternatives. He only wants funding for research that kills human embryos.

This seems perverse to me, but Castle might succeed. The House is taking up the alternatives-funding bill tonight under “suspension” rules, which require two-thirds support. If Castle’s opposition makes Democrats see an opportunity, he can defeat this bill.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

World

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More
U.S.

Questions for Those Who Believed Jussie Smollett

The “we reported the Jussie Smollett case responsibly” contention has been blasted to smithereens. Twitter accounts and headlines in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times reported as fact Jussie Smollett’s wildly implausible allegations, and many other journalists did so as ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More