The Corner

Politics & Policy

Bannon vs. the Kochs

Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon speaks during a campaign rally for Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Judge Roy Moore in Midland City, Alabama, December 11, 2017. (Jonathan Bachman/Reuters)

I laughed very hard at this Politico story: “Bannon to Kochs: ‘Shut up and get with the program.’” It was a joyful, life-affirming laugh. Alex Isenstadt reports:

He described the Koch political operation as ineffective, saying it had wasted untold dollars on losing past elections. And he argued that voters had rejected the free-trade approach the Kochs embrace in favor of Trump’s brand of economic populism.

“We can have a theoretical discussion later, OK? This is why they don’t know what it means to win, OK? We don’t have time to have some theoretical discussion and to have their spokesman come out and say the president is divisive,” Bannon said.

First some background: The Koch brothers co-founded the Cato Institute with Murray Rothbard and Ed Crane. They created or supported countless other libertarian initiatives, programs, and institutions over the last half century. Charles Koch is a full-throated acolyte of Ludwig von Mises, and he built his career around a Mises-inspired philosophy of “market-based management.” He wrote a book on the subject — an effort I guarantee you he didn’t undertake for the royalties. David Koch ran for vice president of the United States on the Libertarian ticket — against Ronald Reagan! David is fairly liberal on drugs, abortion, etc. But he’s hardcore libertarian on economic issues, founding Citizens for a Sound Economy. Both opposed the Iraq War.

I could go on, but you should get the point.

But just in case you don’t: The idea that the Kochs would embrace protectionism for the good of the Republican party is insanely, profoundly, splurt-coffee-out-your-nostrils hilariously stupid. Saying to the Kochs, “We can have a theoretical discussion later” about whether free trade is good is like telling surgeons, “We can talk about whether the patient actually needs a heart transplant down the road. You just need to start cutting.”

And the idea they should shut up and get with the program because Steve Bannon is playing the tough guy with a Politico reporter is amusing beyond words.

“For 50 years, we’ve bucked the conventional wisdom and put our money where our mouths are supporting free-market economics as a morally and ethically superior approach. And we’ve been demonized by the press, hectored from the right and the left, leaned on by presidents and CEOs alike, and even though we have about $40 billion in F-you money apiece, I think we’re going to have to support protectionism. I mean Steve Bannon told Politico we have to ‘get with the program.’ It was a good run.”

Yes, I can totally see one of the Koch brothers saying that.

Oh, I almost forgot. This whole thing is a pas de deux of asininity, because the candle of dumb burns from both ends. Not only is it barmy to think David and Charles Koch would bend to this, it’s even barmier to think that Steve Bannon is the person to lecture anyone about losing elections. I know there are people out there who think Bannon singlehandedly won the election for Trump (pollsters call this demographic “Steve Bannon”). But even if one were willing to entertain that idea, look at his record since. Nearly every goblin, Morlock, and troll that he’s supported in his vaunted war on the establishment has gone down in flames. One of his favorites, Paul Nehlen, revealed himself to be a full-on hater of the Jooooz. The golden nugget in Bannon’s turd parade was Roy Moore, whom Bannon bet on big. It was a power move in which Bannon broke with the president, who fired him on the theory that Bannon was building a movement. The result: He gave Jeff Sessions’s Senate seat to the Democrats. In Alabama.

Meanwhile, with no thanks to Bannon, but with considerable thanks to the Koch network, the GOP gained more elected positions at the state, local, and federal levels in the last decade than any time since the 1920s.

But yes, the Kochs must abandon their principles and cave to the nigh upon papal authority of Steve Bannon. I mean he wears so many shirts, he must know something we don’t.

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More

Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More