The Corner

Subject: One term pledge

Here’s how McCain would roughly have to present it, via an e-mail:

Rich, I completely agree … that McCain should take a one-term pledge.  I think, however, that McCain should save this card for the convention speech.  McCain’s election is the last chance for conservative reform approaches to the health care system, Social Security, the military and so many other problems. During his convention speech, McCain can make the argument “Are we really ready to turn the health care system over to the government, as Senator Obama wants, or should we first try less radical solutions, like making insurance more affordable by giving people refundable tax credits and letting them buy less expensive policies across state lines.  Are we really ready to impose massive new Social Security taxes on the American people, the largest tax increase in American history, as Senator Obama proposes, or should we first try to come together, as we have done before when Social Security was in trouble, to shore up the system without risking the kind of harm to the economy that Senator Obama’s proposals will surely cause.”We can do these things together,” McCain can argue during his speech, “if we’re willing to talk straight to the American people, willing to come together with people across the political spectrum to find solutions to these problems, and willing to put America first, before our personal interests as politicians.”And then, he can deliver the lines that may win him the election:  “We can do these things together, and tonight I make to you this solemn pledge:  From the day you elect me as the next President of the United States, I will spend every moment working to make our country stronger and safer.  I will not spend one minute worrying about my own political fortunes or how I will fare in the next election.  I can pledge that, my friends, because for me, there will not be another election.”Imagine the impact this would have on the race.  The operative question, in the key weeks post-Labor Day, would become, “Why not give the hero, the bipartisan deal-maker, the straight-talker, one term to try it his way?”  (And even Democrats would have to ask whether Obama would be better with four more years of experience, or whether having an open presidency in 2012 would be the best thing for Hillary.)

He’ll never get more attention, or more bang out of the pledge, than he will get at the convention.

Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: comments.lowry@nationalreview.com. 

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More