The Corner

‘Subsidizing’ Parents?

It is amazing and discouraging to me that the discourse on NRO on the child exemption has been about “social engineering” and “subsidizing parents,” as if children were consumer goods.

The heart of the child exemption (and of course I’m not speaking here about the earned income tax credit which is a transfer program to low-income parents who work) is the idea that the family of four, or six, at a given income in a progressive tax system should not pay the same as an individual at the same level.

Children are not consumer goods, they are (forgive me) public goods. They are necessary for all of us, whether or not we personally choose to have children.

A man who is supporting a wife and three kids should not be taxed as if he were a single man. He is not. His income is supporting five people, not one person, in terms of basic need.

You want to eliminate progressivity altogether, well, fine, that’s one theory. But under a progressive tax code, the assumption is that ability to pay has some relationship to marginal tax rates.

By the way, the child tax exemption is the single most effective pro-family policy anyone has found. It is totally unlike the European solutions, which involve government checks to people with families, a signal of dependence. Instead, it helps the economy of gratitude within the family, by preserving the basic income necessary to support families from government intrusion.

Conservatives are losing basic information they once understood, during the Reagan years.

Most Popular

Media

The Biden Protection Racket

Joe Biden is the most cosseted presidential candidate in memory. He’s run a minimalist campaign that’s avoided the press as much as possible, while the press hasn’t been braying for more access and answers, but eager to avoid anything that could be discomfiting to the campaign. Never before have the ... Read More
Media

The Biden Protection Racket

Joe Biden is the most cosseted presidential candidate in memory. He’s run a minimalist campaign that’s avoided the press as much as possible, while the press hasn’t been braying for more access and answers, but eager to avoid anything that could be discomfiting to the campaign. Never before have the ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More
Elections

Why Hunter?

Hunter Biden, Joe’s younger son, has become a fixture of the 2020 race. Since August 27, 2019, Donald Trump has tweeted about Hunter 59 separate times, making his colorful past one of the Trump campaign’s most important attacks on his rival. For many years, Hunter struggled with serious drug and alcohol ... Read More
Elections

Why Hunter?

Hunter Biden, Joe’s younger son, has become a fixture of the 2020 race. Since August 27, 2019, Donald Trump has tweeted about Hunter 59 separate times, making his colorful past one of the Trump campaign’s most important attacks on his rival. For many years, Hunter struggled with serious drug and alcohol ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More