The Corner

Takei Ignorantly Misconstrues Justice Thomas

I understand that George Takei had an emotional stake in the Obergefell outcome. But his attack against Clarence Thomas’s dissent was so ignorant and hysterical that it bears rebutting.

Adding racism to insult (“clown in blackface”), Takei claimed falsely that Thomas wrote that slavery was somehow “dignified.” He most certainly did not.

Rather, Thomas argued that human dignity is intrinsic and equal among all human beings, and moreover, that our inherent worth can’t be taken away by government or anyone else.

As I write over at Human Exceptionalism:

​Slavery did not strip its victims of their inherent dignity. It was evil precisely because they had inherent dignity.

So does each and every LGBT human being.

I have no doubt that Thomas would agree because he well understands what intrinsic human dignity is all about.

Thomas’s discussion was clearly above George Takei’s intellectual pay grade. He owes the quiet justice a big, fat apology

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

When the Tide Comes In

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader, “Save Ike from the Kikes.” I’d better explain. This weekend marks the one-year anniversary of the Nazi troll armies’ march ... Read More

Stephen Miller’s ‘Hypocrisy’

What does it mean to be a hypocrite in politics? Stephen Miller, an adviser to President Donald Trump, has been denounced in the pages of Politico for his “hypocrisy,” by his uncle, no less. Miller, like the president, supports a more restrictive approach to immigration. His uncle, David S. Glosser, ... Read More