The Corner

A Tax By Another Name

Writing in the New York Times yesterday, Yuval Levin made the case for means-testing Social Security and Medicare. As you’d expect from Yuval the case is well made and elegantly thought-through. It’s also, if I may respectfully say so, misguided. Partly as a consequence of the refusal to make consumption take its fair share of the tax load, the US already taxes income on a pretty progressive basis (even more so,  I suspect, if, just for the sake of argument, you excluded the very richest from the equation—highly taxed wage income generally makes up a lower percentage of their total take). Means-testing these two programs would only tighten the screws still further.

As Yuval sees, it this would be done as a part of a grand bargain:

First, give less to the wealthy rather than take more from them.

Fine, in principle, but, in reality, principle would have nothing to do with it. Does anyone think for a moment that the government would stick with the tax-cutting side of the equation (which would in any event exclude state taxation, no small matter in certain parts of the country)  for more than a few years? History would, to put it mildly, suggest exactly the opposite. What’s more, the question of who would fall the wrong side of the means-testing divide is not a question that would just be asked on one occasion. Once it was accepted that such benefits should be universal, their fairly rapid erosion, whether through time (inflation) or deliberate policy is almost certainly guaranteed. People who had never thought they would be classified as wealthy would now find themselves on the wrong end of a means test. To some on the right that might be considered a feature, not a bug, but, electorally, it would be poison, not only now, but forever, with the question of who was or was not entitled to these benefits being a matter of a permanent debate in which fiscal hawks would find themselves winning few friends.

And then, of course, there is the question of the message that (as, in a British context, Mrs. Thatcher always understood) such a change would send, just one more punch thrown at the successful, a later-life preview of the blow to come—with estate tax— after their death.

Yuval notes:

Some on the right might complain that such reforms would punish success. But surely rewarding achievement with government aid is no one’s idea of conservatism.

No, it’s not. But in the real world you have to work with what you have.

None of this is to say that nothing should be done on the expenditure side of the ledger. To take a few examples, should the age of entitlement be increased? Yes, with the caveat that the equation (so far as Medicare is concerned) will become more complicated with Obamacare. Turning to Social Security, should we move to something closer to Sweden’s notional defined-contribution system? Maybe. Returning to the topic of Medicare, there clearly does (as Gov. Daniels pointed out a year or so back) need to be a closer look at what is covered, particularly at the closing stages of life. Medicare should also be (as is argued, amongst many other things, in this fascinating, if sometimes wrong-headed article for Time by Steven Brill, another means-tester of sorts) allowed to negotiate the price it pays for medical equipment and prescription drugs. And so on and on. There is plenty to do, just don’t do means-testing.

Most Popular


Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More

Democrats Think They Can Win without You

A  few days ago, Ericka Anderson, an old friend of National Review, popped up in the pages of the New York Times lamenting that “the Democratic presidential field neglects abundant pools of potential Democrat converts, leaving persuadable audiences — like independents and Trump-averse, anti-abortion ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More