The Corner

Tax Deal Chart

We decided to throw another question to potential presidential candidates: “If given the opportunity to vote ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on the Obama-McConnell tax deal as it currently stands (i.e., no further revisions), how would you vote?”

Newt Gingrich’s people said he wouldn’t answer this one, for some reason. Tim Pawlenty is a “yes,” with more of an explanation below, and John Bolton is also a “yes” and provides more context below.

Will update as we get more.

 

Q. If given the opportunity to vote “yes” or “no” on the Obama-McConnell tax deal as it currently stands (i.e., no further revisions), how would you vote?

 

Yes

No

Don’t Know

John Bolton   

 X

 

 

Mitch Daniels   

 

 

 

Newt Gingrich   

 N/A

 N/A

 N/A 

Mike Huckabee   

 

 

 

Gary Johnson   

 

 

 

Sarah Palin   

 

 

 

Tim Pawlenty   

X

 

 

Mike Pence   

 

 

 

Mitt Romney   

 

 

 

Rick Santorum   

 

 

 

John Thune   

 

 

 

A Pawlenty aide writes:

“Gov. Pawlenty was asked about this on Neil Cavuto on Friday. He said he’d support the deal, but with obvious reluctance. Here’s the clip & rough transcript.

John Bolton writes:

I would vote “yes” on the original deal as negotiated between Senator McConnell and President Obama.  We should recognize the deal, however, only as a temporary compromise.  It solves little or nothing from further political debate, as President Obama has already pledged from his side.  Starting January 1,everything is back in play.

If my arm were twisted hard enough, I would vote for the bill introduced by Senator Reid, which the Wall Street Journal rightly says is “becoming a favor festival.”  I would not accept any further changes from anyone, except removing whatever of the Reid add-ons it might be possible to eliminate through whatever creative parliamentary maneuvers are available.

There are two critical points here. 

First is a matter of high principle.  The Republican policy objective on taxes, starting now, should be to move toward a flat-tax approach, lowering tax rates and eliminating or simplifying the structure of deductions, exclusions, exemptions, and credits that have built up over the years, largely to mitigate against progressive marginal tax rates or to benefit special interests with sufficient political clout. 

That means, Iowa caucuses or no Iowa caucuses, that the “Hawkeye Handout” and its ilk have to be disappeared.  The ultimate aim of tax policy should be to raise the necessary revenues for government with the minimal possible distortion of individual and business decision making.  Tax policy should not be social policy, and it should minimize or eliminate the distortions in productive economic activity that are endemic under our current tax laws.

Second is a matter of practical politics.  Senator McConnell and all Congressional Republicans must set a precedent now that a deal with President Obama is also a deal with his entire party.  What Senator Reid has already done, and what Speaker Pelosi longs to do, is to get second and third bites at our apple.  We should tell them unambiguously:  Forget it!  If Congressional Republicans succumb to serial negotiations now or during the next two years, they will be making a serious error.

Rich Lowry — Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: comments.lowry@nationalreview.com. 

Most Popular

World

Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Sports

Hurray for the NBA

Last month, just before the Final Four, I did a Q&A on college basketball with our Theodore Kupfer. Teddy K. is back, by popular demand, joined by two other experts: Vivek Dave, an old friend of mine from Michigan, who has long lived in Chicago, and David French, National Review’s Kentucky Kid, now ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More