The Corner

Tax Relief for Parents and Its Critics

Rich Cromwell makes four arguments against the expanded child tax credit favored by Marco Rubio in this Federalist article.

First: Tax relief for parents is social engineering. Cromwell sort of concedes that the child credit partly offsets the anti-child-rearing bias created by Social Security and Medicare, but says that it’s wrong to create a new entitlement to undo the damage created by another one. Since neither of these programs is going to disappear into some libertarian paradise, though, we’ve got two choices on this issue: Accept a large implicit tax on larger families, or try to cut it. I’m for cutting it. Cromwell doesn’t squarely face the choice.

Second: Tax relief for parents isn’t tax relief at all. “[Y]ou know what a real tax cut looks like? It looks like money in your bank account. It looks like money that the government didn’t borrow for a minute before giving it back because you made the ‘correct’ decisions.” The government doesn’t borrow the money in a child credit from you and give it back. When you start a job and complete your W-4, you put down how many kids you have. That determines how much money D.C. withholds from your paycheck. Expand the credit, and less will be withheld. Which means, well, money in your bank account.

Third: The existing child credit has not strengthened families. No evidence is presented for this view, and for that matter no metric is proposed to judge whether families have been strengthened. Let’s say we had good studies showing that the modest child credit in existing law had increased the number of children born to married couples. Wouldn’t Cromwell and like-minded critics of the child credit just say this was a sign that the policy was the social engineering they dread?

Fourth: Increasing the child credit won’t raise economic growth. Fair enough. But it will help build the popularity of a tax plan that includes pro-growth measures. Cromwell says that Rand Paul’s plan is better, because more focused on growth, than Rubio’s. The Tax Foundation disagrees, finding that Paul’s plan would raise GDP over the next ten years by 12.9 percent while Rubio’s would raise it by 15 percent.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More

Democrats Think They Can Win without You

A  few days ago, Ericka Anderson, an old friend of National Review, popped up in the pages of the New York Times lamenting that “the Democratic presidential field neglects abundant pools of potential Democrat converts, leaving persuadable audiences — like independents and Trump-averse, anti-abortion ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More