The Corner

Law & the Courts

Ted Kennedy Killed the Judicial Filibuster

Every news outlet in America is reporting that the Democrats have secured enough votes to filibuster Judge Gorsuch. At the same time, it is equally universally understood that the GOP is almost certainly planning to invoke the so-called “nuclear option” to confirm him through majority vote. No doubt the next several days will be dominated by thinkpieces wondering What This Means and pondering How We Got Here, but let me make a modest suggestion. This is Ted Kennedy’s fault.

I was eighteen years old when he delivered his infamous summary of “Robert Bork’s America:”

Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.

This wasn’t a legal critique, it was character assassination, and it was character assassination that worked. One of the most thoughtful and qualified judges ever nominated for the Supreme Court was defeated as part of a pure political power play, one justified through slanderous and scandalous rhetoric. 

Senate traditions — like the filibuster — are maintained not just through inertia but also by good faith. While the system can tolerate the occasional exploitation, it can’t tolerate systematic exploitation, and “Borking” help transform the advise and consent process from a safeguard against unqualified nominees to an exercise in pure power politics. For almost 30 years, that transformation benefited Democrats exclusively. They consistently obtained the Supreme Court judges they wanted, while Republicans were often forced to nominate less well-known jurists in an effort to find someone who would embody conservative judicial values while still securing sufficient votes for confirmation. Democrats batted a thousand with their nominees. The GOP struck out more than once.

This one-sided political war ended in 2016 when Senator McConnell decided to behave exactly as he knew the Democrats would and blocked Merrick Garland while he waited on the results of the 2016 election. The Democrats howled, but no honest person in DC thought that if the roles were reversed Harry Reid would have allowed a vote on, say, a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The war continues in 2017. The Democrats are on the verge of a filibuster justified by incandescently idiotic arguments. The Republicans will almost certainly respond with yet another power move. A Senate tradition likely dies this week. I wonder if Ted Kennedy would be proud of this part of his legacy? Time will tell, I suppose. 


David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular


Holy Week with Saint Paul

Just the other day, I ordered a replacement copy of The Passion of the Christ -- it can be so impactful for Holy Week meditation. In the years since its release, it’s become something of required Lenten viewing for me. But this year, there is a new movie to help with prayer, Paul, Apostle of Christ, released ... Read More

Friday Links

UPS Trucks (Mostly) Don't Turn Left, Saving Them 10 Million Gallons of Gas Per Year. Scientists provide comprehensive breakdown of how much people poo in their lifetime. Famed archaeologist forged murals, inscriptions for decades. How Do You Make Beer in Space? Astronauts return to earth ... Read More

Heckuva Job, Paul and Mitch

As Thursday's editorial makes clear, the omnibus spending bill is a disgrace. That may be why about 40 percent of Republicans (and 40 percent of Democrats) voted against it. Apart from the absence of a DACA/Dream amnesty, the immigration portions represent a comprehensive victory by the anti-enforcement crowd. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

California’s Pro-Nuclear Renegade

If California’s upcoming gubernatorial race gets decided solely by money, Michael Shellenberger doesn’t have a chance. The latest campaign filings show that Shellenberger, an environmentalist from Berkeley, has about $37,000 in cash on hand. The frontrunner in the June 5 California primary, Lieutenant ... Read More