1. Join us for a conversation Ryan Anderson and I will be having with Mona Charen later this month in Washington, D.C.: Sex Matters: How Modern Feminism Lost Touch with Science, Love, and Common Sense
2. In the Washington Post, a window into the unexpected and redemptive ways foster-care can work out when generous hearts are open.
4. The Becket Fund has a podcast with human faces of their religious-liberty cases. Latest episode is with Sr. Constance Veit from the Little Sisters of the Poor.
Also, Sister Constance on religious freedom and “Serving Others in God’s Love.”
5. Robert P. George on Amy Barrett as “The Diversity Nominee” — First Things
The overriding consideration, however, is that our justices be faithful constitutionalists—and by that I mean, jurists whose decisions are guided by the text, logic, structure, and original public meaning of the Constitution. These are people who do not pretend that things that are not in the Constitution are there (lurking, perhaps, in “penumbras formed by emanations” or in the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments interpreted “substantively”), or that things that actually are in the Constitution are not there.
Due in no small measure to thirty years of remarkable work in legal education by the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy, presidents today who are looking for true constitutionalists to nominate for appointments to the federal judiciary at every level, including the Supreme Court, have an outstanding pool of possible nominees. From this pool, President Trump selected Neil Gorsuch—a jurist of high intellect, exceptional learning, impeccable integrity, and admirable temperament. The question now: Who should be next?
Of course, it might be that, in fact, prejudice against Catholics and other traditional religious believers is not the last acceptable prejudice. There is one more: prejudice against large families, and especially against women who have large families. (Do you doubt me? Just ask any mother of five or more children about the abusive comments to which she is subjected, sometimes by complete strangers,
when out in public with the kids.) Amy Coney Barrett is the mother of seven children—one is a special needs child, and two are adopted (from Haiti). Defying that prejudice while giving the country a top-class Supreme Court justice drawn from a superb pool would be another merit of the president’s choosing Judge Barrett.
6. On Amy Barrett, I’m grateful for this Ruth Graham piece at Slate.
And for this Chris Hayes tweet:
A few thoughts about Amy Coney Barrett:
– How she chooses to worship is her business, and we should take seriously the wisdom and righteousness of a ban on religious test for office.
– I think her views on Roe are pretty clear.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) July 2, 2018
And, of course, Mona’s.
“Judge Amy Barrett Speaks About The Difficult Role Of A SCOTUS Justice” (Hat tip Mark Levin.)
7. At the Mirror of Justice blog: Roe will probably be reversed even further than before; the real combat is over Casey.
This is an excellent and informative conversation that reinforces the argument Frederick Douglass ought to be considered among the greatest American philosophers and thinkers. (He really IS getting recognized more and more.) https://t.co/9M1tUlhLDd
— Mike Warren (@MichaelRWarren) July 3, 2018
We have to judge moral insights based on whether or not they are true–not on who says them. pic.twitter.com/TJYxyWLCrW
— NRIWFBonVirtue (@NRIWFBonVirtue) July 5, 2018
(& do follow if you’re on Twitter.)
Generosity is the antidote that frees us from the cage of greed and competition. Have you ever met anyone who regretted being generous?
— James Forsyth (@jameswforsyth) July 5, 2018
Sign up for my free newsletter! You’ll get an update every Saturday.