The Corner

Texas, Tennessee, and Nine Other States Challenge the Obama Administration’s Transgender Edict

The legal counterattack against the Obama administration’s latest round of lawlessness is now under way. Texas, Tennessee, Alabama, and eight other states filed suit today in Texas to block enforcement not just of the administration’s latest “Dear Colleague” directing publicly-funded colleges and schools to treat “gender identity” as a protected class under Title IX, but of multiple unilateral actions that have dramatically expanded the scope of both Title IX and Title VII. 

The Complaint itself outlines much of what my colleagues and I have reported in National Review. Congress has never expanded Title IX or Title VII to include sexual orientation or gender identity as additional protected classes. Indeed, it has explicitly declined to do so. Moreover, the drafters of Title IX specifically and unequivocally indicated that it was not intended to prohibit schools and colleges from maintaining sex-segregated bathrooms and living facilities. 

Rather than persuading Congress and the American people that legal change was necessary, the administration attempted to circumvent constitutional process by executive fiat — without even bothering to go through the formality of a public notice-and-comment process. It just declared the change, and now seeks to enforce the change.

As the case winds its way through the courts, it’s far from clear that the administration will have unanimous support from the legal Left. As I note in my post below, already brave liberal voices from elite law schools have raised questions about the Obama administration’s tactics. And those with foresight know that executive power, once expanded, is difficult to contain. A President Trump could issue his own edicts, and then the Left would suddenly rediscover it’s love for the separation of powers and the rule of law.

In the meantime, Texas and its allied states are once again on a collision course with the Obama administration, and this case — like its challenge to executive amnesty — looks destined for the Supreme Court. Congress has failed to adequately protect its prerogatives, but when Congress fails to lead at least we know we can count on the Lone Star State. Thankfully, America’s checks and balances extend far beyond Washington D.C. 

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

White House

What Is Hillary Clinton Thinking?

When Homer Simpson looks in the mirror, he sees ripped chest muscles and arms like the trunks of beech trees. When Hillary Clinton looks in the mirror, she sees America’s sweetheart. She thinks: America adores me. She thinks: America already chose me to be president once! She thinks: Everyone is comparing me ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Grassley’s Kangaroo Court

So now it looks like next Thursday. On Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s manifestly meritorious nomination to the Supreme Court, what was supposed to be the vote out of the Senate Judiciary Committee this past Thursday now appears to be sliding into a hearing to be held next Thursday. Or, who knows, maybe a Thursday ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Censure Dianne Feinstein

Regardless of the fate of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, the Senate should censure the ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein. Her deception and maneuvering, condemned across the political spectrum, seriously interfered with the Senate’s performance of its constitutional duty to ... Read More

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?

Americans keep dividing into two hostile camps. It seems the country is back to 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, rather than in 2018, during the greatest age of affluence, leisure, and freedom in the history of civilization. The ancient historian Thucydides called the civil discord that tore apart the ... Read More