The Corner

Economy & Business

The Green New Deal and a Universal Basic Income

A universal basic income has been experiencing a resurgence of popularity over the last few years, especially (although not exclusively) on the Left. One of the obvious political disadvantages of the idea is that Americans tend to favor requiring individuals receiving government spending to work.

Over the last week, the extent of that political problem became clear. The Green New Deal, as has been widely noted, is a progressive wish list. It deliberately sets its ambitions high at the expense of political realism. Yet the Green New Deal’s supporters have been running away as fast as they can from the idea that it would provide “economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work.” They’ve repudiated a “frequently asked questions” document about the deal that contained that line. The text of the resolution calls for “economic security” for all, but specifies that it will include a guaranteed jobs program — not a guaranteed income for those who don’t want to work.

The idea of a UBI, though, is precisely that everyone gets it, whether or not they work or want to work. Even on the left-utopian edge of American politics, that seems to be an impossible lift.

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?

If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More

In Defense of Tulsi

Some years ago, a liberal-minded friend of mine complained during lunch that Fox News was “stealing” his elderly parents. “They should be enjoying retirement,” he said, noting that they live in a modest but comfortable style with attentive children and grandchildren to enjoy. “But instead,” he sighed, ... Read More

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More

Not Less Religion, Just Different Religion

The Pew Poll tells us that society is secularizing -- particularly among the young -- and who can deny it? That is one reason that the free expression of religion is under such intense pressure in the West. But it seems to me that we aren't really becoming less religious. Rather, many are merely changing that ... Read More

The Crisis of Catholic Leadership

In the last 48 hours there have been two big Vatican stories. First, revelations about the Holy See’s financial crisis; second, and more bizarrely, a furious dispute over statues being thrown into the Tiber. But really it’s all one story, the big story of contemporary Catholicism: a disastrous failure of ... Read More