The Corner


The ‘Illegitimacy’ of the 2016 Election

President Donald Trump speaks to the news media in Washington, D.C., January 14, 2019. (Leah Millis/REUTERS)

If you can remember all the way back to 2016, around October or November, you’ll recall that all the best people were pronouncing with great sobriety that the great test of patriotism and citizenship of the hour would be whether Donald Trump and his partisans would “accept the outcome” of the presidential election. Everyone from the New York Times to Epic Rap Battles of History was on that case. Trump joked that he’d accept the outcome if he won.

And then he won.

Since then, rejecting the outcome of the 2016 election has been the great test of patriotism and citizenship of the day. The Democrats did not declare themselves the loyal opposition — they declared themselves “the Resistance,” a martial appellation for an ersatz civil war. (Anybody remember when Sarah Palin’s graphic artist’s crosshairs constituted morally out-of-bounds rhetoric?) Fortunately, the American Left and its media cheerleaders are entirely immune to irony. Lucky them.

Michael Tomasky, writing in the New York Times on Sunday, offers a hilariously question-begging analysis: Would Democrats be better off impeaching Trump or waiting until 2020 and his inevitable electoral defeat? Tomasky prefers the ballot box, because — not that he’s a cynical and narrow partisan or anything like that!– “it will do more long-term damage to the Republican party.” Well, there’s that.

But the case for impeachment, he writes, is strong, too: “If you can’t impeach a president whose very election is found to have been illegitimate, then whom can you impeach?”

But there is not really any evidence that Trump’s election has been “found to have been illegitimate.” Even if the worst that Trump et al. are accused of should be found to be true, it would take a great leap to conclude that that would render the 2016 election illegitimate. If our standard for illegitimacy is a foreign-funded effort to influence the outcome of a U.S. presidential election, then the 1996 presidential election was illegitimate — and, very likely, so was practically every other election in modern history. Colluding with a foreign government in the way that has been alleged would be a serious offense and one that would deserve the harshest punishment. But the election was the election; the votes were cast and counted, and there has been no credible allegation that the election itself was interfered with in any way beyond what is sometimes described as “black P.R.”

The powerful temptation to engage in such shenanigans is kind of mystifying, if you know anything about how voters actually make decisions. But it seems to be irresistible. Consider the weird Democratic “false flag” operation — that’s the New York Times’s description, not Alex Jones’s — against Roy Moore. My recollection of that race is that there was plenty to detest about Roy Moore without reinventing him as, of all things, a neo-prohibitionist. It’s as though the shenanigan itself, and not any political juice to be had from it, is the payoff.

As usual, the Democrats are not thinking very carefully about the precedent they are creating. As usual, that’s going to work out badly for them.

Most Popular


A Reckoning Is in Store for Democrats

The crisis of the Democrats is becoming more evident each week. Those of us who have been loudly predicting for years that the Russian-collusion argument would be exposed as a defamatory farce, and that the authors of it would eventually pay for it, are bemused at the fallback position of the Trump-haters: that ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Ilhan Omar: A Hostage Situation

‘It has to stop,” says Representative Ilhan Omar. No, it does not. Representative Omar, the Jew-hating Minnesota Democrat, is engaged in one of her usual games of misdirection, a pattern of hers that by now is familiar enough to be predicted: She says something outrageously stupid, offensive, ... Read More

Why ‘Stop Sanders’?

'Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?” T. S. Eliot asked. “Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” And where is the intelligence we have lost in cleverness? Cleverness is the plague of our political classes, an influenza of the intellect. The consultants are always trying to ... Read More