The Corner

Politics & Policy

The Tax Cut Was a Small Win for Families

A U.S. Air Force bus meant to transport Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to an international flight sits in Washington, D.C., January 17, 2019. (Joshua Roberts/REUTERS)

The American Enterprise Institute (where I am a fellow) has been running a series of brief analyses of the effects of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act — the most important piece of legislation enacted by the Republican Congress of 2017–18 with President Trump. Economists who lean right have generally been writing that the tax cut had a small positive effect on the economy. Economists on the left have generally found that it had a very small positive effect. As part of the series, Alex Brill has examined the effects of the law on families.

For several years before the tax cut was enacted, some conservatives had been arguing that parents, and especially parents of large families, are overtaxed, and that the child tax credit should be expanded to relieve them. I was in this camp. Brill quotes a warning of mine from August 2017 that advocates of tax relief for parents might get little or nothing from the tax bill. An early version of the Republican plan heightened that suspicion. As the bill moved through Congress, however, it got better, and by the end it included a small increase in tax relief for parents. Under the tax code before the law, the child tax credit and the dependent exemption were worth about $1,600 per child for middle-class families; afterward, the dependent exemption vanished but the child credit was worth $2,000 per child.

Brill looks at the effects of all of the provisions of the tax cut. He finds that on average, households got larger tax cuts the more children they include — but that the difference was small. “[T]he difference in tax liabilities among filers with children varies by less than $1,000 when comparing one-child families with three-children families, which is perhaps too modest for the pro-family tax advocacy community.” This is what we should have expected given the final dimensions of the bill.

I favor building on this progress. Brill does not. He would rather work to make the tax code more conducive to economic growth, which would benefit people whether or not they have children. He concludes, “To pursue the alternative is to consider the tax code merely a means of redistributing income from the childless taxpayer to parents and will leave us all with a distorted tax base of 20-somethings and seniors.”

This is overdrawn in several ways. We are a long way away from the stunted tax base he mentions. A credit of $4,500 per child would leave plenty of middle-aged people (non-parents, parents of one child, parents with high incomes) on the tax rolls. A larger tax credit would (as I argue here) reduce the total amount of redistribution the federal government effects. And the choice is not a stark one. Every major tax law of the past 35 years that attempted to promote growth has also included at least some tax relief tied to children, and I suspect this is no accident.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

More Evidence the Guardrails Are Gone

At the end of last month, just as the news of the Ukraine scandal started dominating the news cycle, I argued that we're seeing evidence that the guardrails that staff had placed around Donald Trump's worst instincts were in the process of breaking down. When Trump's staff was at its best, it was possible to draw ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review

Farewell

Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More
World

Is America Becoming Sinicized?

A little over 40 years ago, Chinese Communist strongman and reformer Deng Xiaoping began 15 years of sweeping economic reforms. They were designed to end the disastrous, even murderous planned economy of Mao Zedong, who died in 1976. The results of Deng’s revolution astonished the world. In four decades, ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More