The Corner

Economy & Business

The Tax Reform Did Not ‘Discriminate against Blue State Voters’

There’s a new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research out today called Did the 2017 Tax Reform Discriminate against Blue State Voters? It’s a fairly interesting exercise, looking at how much extra money individuals will have to spend and calculating that, if the law is made permanent,

the average percentage increase in remaining lifetime spending under the TCJA is 1.6 percent in red states versus 1.3 percent in blue states. Among the richest 10 percent of households, this differential is larger. Rich households in red states enjoyed a 2.0 percent increase compared to a 1.2 percent increase among the rich in blue-state households. This gap is driven almost entirely by the limitation on the SALT deduction. Excluding the SALT limitation from the TCJA results in a spending gain of 2.6 percent for rich red-state households compared to 2.7 percent for rich blue-state households.

Good to know. But this is not proof of discrimination. Rather, it shines a light on the discrimination that took place in the old system.

The SALT deduction, as you may know, allows taxpayers to deduct their state and local tax payments from their federal returns. So when a state chooses to hikes its own taxes, it also secures its residents a tax break from the federal government, which in turn eventually has to either raise taxes or cut spending nationwide to make up for the lost revenue. This spreads the burden around to states that didn’t choose to hike their own taxes.

The paper itself notes that for those that itemize, SALT deductibilty acts as a federal subsidy for state and local tax collections at the rate of [the individuals’] marginal federal tax rate. And oddly enough it does not use any form of the word discriminate except in the title, the most prominent words in the entire text.

It is not discrimination against blue states to limit a deduction that subsidizes blue states. The truly non-discriminatory thing to do would be to eliminate it entirely.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Ten Questions for the ‘Squad’

Democratic infighting reached a fever pitch last week with bickering and personal attacks between members of the “Squad” and other House Democrats. During that period, Squad members Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley mostly avoided doing interviews. However, that all ... Read More
World

Who Is Boris Johnson?

By next week at this time, Boris Johnson will be prime minister of the United Kingdom. Not since Margaret Thatcher has such an outsized personality resided in Number 10 Downing Street. Not since Winston Churchill has such a wit presided over Her Majesty’s Government. Wit is actually the chief reason for ... Read More
Culture

White Cats and Black Swans

Making a film of Cats is a bold endeavor — it is a musical with no real plot, based on T. S. Eliot’s idea of child-appropriate poems, and old Tom was a strange cat indeed. Casting Idris Elba as the criminal cat Macavity seems almost inevitable — he has always made a great gangster — but I think there was ... Read More
Energy & Environment

Ohio Bans ‘Nature Rights’

Finally! After voters in Toledo granted "rights" to Lake Erie -- in a special election, it should be noted, with minuscule turnout -- Ohio has outlawed the enforcement of "nature rights" in a budget bill signed by the governor. From the legislation: Sec. 2305.011...[Definitions omitted] (B) Nature or any ... Read More