The Corner


The Uses and Abuses of Bullpenning

Dodgers pitcher Hyun-Jin Ryu throws in the first inning of Game Two of the 2018 World Series at Fenway Park in Boston, Mass., October 24, 2018. (Bob DeChiara/USA TODAY Sports)

In response to Unhittable Pitching

As I write this, Ryan Madson, relief pitcher for the Los Angeles Dodgers, is walking in the tying run in the fifth inning of the World Series. He came in with two outs and two men on base for Dodgers starter Hyun-Jin Ryu before walking batter Steve Pearce on five pitches. Pulling Ryu — who had to that point let in one run in four and two-thirds innings and thrown 69 pitches — so early is of a piece with managerial strategy that has seen increasing use in baseball: bullpenning.

As Nicholas Frankovich observed on the Corner a couple of days ago in a post evaluating the “strikeout epidemic” of Major League Baseball, “managers now use their pitching staffs more shrewdly than in the past.” He’s referring to this increased flexibility managers have with their bullpens, and their increasing willingness to pull starters early. The model of a starter pitching seven innings followed by, ideally, one or two relievers closing out the game is being replaced with managers’ pulling their starters earlier, using top relievers at high-leverage points early in games rather than saving them for the end, and occasionally not even using starting pitchers at all, choosing to start relievers at the beginning of games and mix and match from there.

The practice is often called “bullpenning.” Its logic is simple. In the regular season, its soundness is hard to deny. Ample statistical evidence shows us that in the course of a single game, a pitcher’s performance declines each time he faces the same hitter. He is most effective his first time through the lineup, less so his second time through, and so on. Evidence also shows that this performance decay isn’t simply a function of fatigue. Hitters get used to the opposing pitcher’s tendencies as pitchers exhaust their bag of tricks. Managers are pulling their starters early to constantly swap in new relievers and avoid such a decay in performance.

Bullpenning is a strategy at the cutting edge of baseball, and in the playoffs, cutting-edge strategies are frequently deployed. In the 2017 and 2018 playoffs, bullpenning became de rigeur. The Houston Astros gave most of their starters, save for Justin Verlander, exceptionally short leashes; the Oakland A’s started a reliever in the wild-card game against the Yankees; and the Milwaukee Brewers and Dodgers set a record for the number of pitching changes in a single playoff series in the just-concluded National League Championship Series.

I’ve been wondering, however, whether the logic for bullpenning holds up over long playoff series. As a matter of scouting, relievers in the regular season might not be under the microscope the way starters are, allowing them to surprise batters with their repertoires. But in the playoffs, opposing teams are surely scrutinizing every pitcher on the roster and reminding their hitters of those pitchers’ tendencies. More to the point, over the course of long series, hitters see the same pitchers over and over again. Wouldn’t bullpenning lead to a similar decay in performance — one that happens not over a single game but over the course of a seven-game series? Just as starters decay every time they work through the batting order, might relievers decay over several games every time they face opposing hitters? (Not to mention the issue of accumulating fatigue.)

This seems plausible to me, but I’m willing to admit there might be some motivated reasoning (I enjoy games more when the starters stay in through the late innings) or confirmation bias (I’ve been especially attuned to relievers making mistakes this playoffs, from Madsen’s mistake just now — which admittedly is outside the purview of my theory, happening as it did in Game 2 — to Jeremy Jeffress’s giving up a three-run homer in Game 7 of the NLCS) at work. There is, however, some limited statistical evidence to support my hypothesis. In a post from 2017 at the sports-analytics blog, the author compiled data from the 2017 playoffs and found that while “relief pitchers outperformed starters the first or second time they were used in a series . . . starting pitchers fared much better than relievers on their fourth and fifth trips through a lineup.”

This is what I’d expect to see if my theory were true. Of course, as the author notes, his sample size is necessarily small, and plenty of other variables might confound his analysis. Still, it seems that bullpenning in the playoffs may have its downsides — and that managers should think a little harder about the strategy before pulling their top-line starters.

Most Popular


One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
Film & TV

A Sublime Christian Masterpiece of a Film

‘There are two ways through life -- the way of nature and the way of grace,” remarks the saintly mother at the outset of The Tree of Life, one of the most awe-inspiring films of the 21st century. She continues: Grace doesn’t try please itself. It accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked, accepts insults ... Read More

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More