The Corner

Thinking Out Loud: The McCain Amendment

I get email every day from people “demanding” to know my position on the McCain amendment. Much of it is goading, taunting and juvenile and clearly whipped up by sanctimony and righteousness elsewhere in the blogosphere.

This is just one reason I’ve been reluctant to weigh-in. I don’t respond well to “double-dog-dare” argumentation.

Another reason is that I just haven’t had time to bone up on the issue and as the level of sanctimony is so high in some quarters, there seemed to be a rush to judgment in the works. The pro-McCain Amendment fervor on the left seems driven by much of the same spirit that lead the anti-Patriot Act fervor a few years ago. Such bandwagons are unbecoming. It was Charles Peguy who once said, “It will never be known what acts of cowardice have been motivated by the fear of not looking sufficiently progressive.”

I also dislike the ahistorical nature of some of this debate. One sometimes gets the sense that the tactics being used by the Bush administration are so far outside the American tradition that previous generations would never have contemplated them. We all know in our sober moments this is nonsense on stilts.

But that’s all somewhat beside the point since this is a serious issue and there are serious people who support the McCain amendment and serious people who oppose it. I found Ramesh’s political argument very persuasive and it inclines me to support it. But I have one very big reservation that I need to learn more about before I can support it. From my reading of the amendment every terrorist in the world under American control can now claim the right to be exempt of cruel and unusual treatment as defined in the US Constitution:

the term ”cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment” means the cruel, unusual, and inhumane treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States…

That just sticks in my craw. Our Supreme Court has, as I understand it, ruled that fairly minor pyshical abuse qualifies as cruel and unusual punishment in recent years. It’s one thing to argue that it’s unconstitutional for a cop to smack around a shoplifter, it’s quite another to say that it’s unconstitutional for an Army Ranger to smack around a high-ranking member of al Qaeda. Moreover, while I still need to read more, I can’t help but think this makes the US Armed Forces more of an extended police force than an army. There’s also the generic reluctance of allowing foreigners to make rights-claims under our constitution. Of course, there are some circumstances where it’s warranted but war doesn’t strike me as one of them.

I agree that our policies need to be clarified and that there are all sorts of good and moral arguments against torture. But this sounds like overkill to me.

But, I need to do more homework.

Jonah Goldberg — Jonah Goldberg holds the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty at the American Enterprise Institute and is a senior editor of National Review. His new book, The Suicide of The West, is on sale now. @jonahnro

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Wheels Begin to Come Off in the House

The Republican House has never been particularly functional, but Ryan has managed to hold it together admirably — until now. The Freedom Caucus took down the farm bill last week to pressure for a vote on a hawkish immigration bill, while a discharge petition is gaining ground with the support of Republican ... Read More
World

Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Wins, America Loses

Derek Scissors of AEI has a sour take on the latest turn in U.S.–China trade talks: If there’s good news, it’s that the Trump administration has fallen silent on whether the U.S. will bend our law for China in the ZTE case, which got so much attention last week. That would be a big step backward. But even ... Read More
Culture

Jonathan Swift in a White Suit

In 1965 Tom Wolfe visited Princeton University for a panel discussion of "the style of the Sixties." The author of The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby, published that year, was scheduled to appear alongside Günter Grass, Allen Ginsberg, and Paul Krassner. Grass spoke first. The German novelist's ... Read More
World

In Appreciation, and against (Too Much) Nostalgia

To put it a little self-pityingly: It seems that my gurus are going, and the world’s. Richard Pipes, the great historian of Russia and the Soviet Union, died on Thursday; Bernard Lewis, the great historian of the Middle East, died yesterday. We had them both for a long time. Pipes was born in 1923, Lewis way ... Read More
Culture

Comedians Are Catching On

The comedians are beginning to catch on. Over the weekend -- just one week after featuring a bevy of top-line Hollywood stars impersonating members of the Trump administration, as well as a cameo by a vengeful Stormy Daniels asking for President Trump’s resignation -- Saturday Night Live finally acknowledged ... Read More
PC Culture

The Nature of Progressive Insensitivity

Former vice president Joe Biden is back in the news yet again. For a second time, he seems surprised that poor residents of the inner city are capable of doing sophisticated jobs: We don't think ordinary people can do things like program, code. It's not rocket science, guys. So, we went and we hired some folks ... Read More
Culture

The Feminization of Everything Fails Our Boys

Let me share with you two troubling — and, I believe, closely linked — news reports. The first, from this weekend, comes courtesy of the American Enterprise Institute’s Mark Perry. In one chart, he highlights the dramatic and growing gender gap in higher education. In short, women are dominating: ... Read More