The Corner

Books, Arts & Manners

Through a Glass, Slowly

Bruce Willis in Glass (Universal Picures/Trailer image via YouTube)

So I saw Glass. I liked it. But I didn’t love it. I’ll avoid all spoilers.

What I liked: It closed the circle on the trilogy with some integrity. I don’t know if M. Night Shyamalan intended it to be a trilogy when he made Unbreakable, but there were enough callbacks that it felt like the organic conclusion to the story — while leaving room for sequels in the franchise. Shyamalan doesn’t quite get the credit he deserves (except from Sonny Bunch) for kind of being ahead of the curve on the live-action superhero genre. Which is ironic because one of the things Shyamalan does is err on the side of keeping the superhuman action . . . human. And that’s refreshing in a weird way. We’re so drenched in CGI action with buildings being hurled and whatnot, that seeing mere cars being shoved seems almost endearing.

What I didn’t like: It’s way too slow and long. Shyamalan is one of the rare writer-directors who typically has a really solid understanding of how to start a movie — to seduce you into the premise — and often a great idea for an ending (though sometimes he swings and misses) but really struggles with the middle. Sometimes it works great, as in The Sixth Sense, but more often it drags because he’s really just trying to persuade the audience that the ending will be worth the wait. And when it’s not, the price of the middle isn’t recouped by the payoff at the end. He’s also hurt by the fact that he sticks to this formula fairly uniformly, so the audience is more likely to get impatient for the twist. That’s what I didn’t like about Split. The big reveal at the end didn’t shock me nearly enough. Glass doesn’t have that problem. I think the payoff at the end is pretty good. But my God, the middle drags along. He could have cut 20 minutes out of the middle and it would have only improved it.

Still, as with Split and Unbreakable (which also dragged in the middle), Glass feels like it will stay with me in ways that many other movies don’t. The slow bits melt away in the memory, like the boring bits on an adventurous long drive. I have other complaints about little things, but as I promised not to traffic in spoilers, I’ll leave them for another time. If you liked the first two, I think you should see it. If you didn’t, I can’t imagine why you’d bother.

Jonah Goldberg, a senior editor of National Review and the author of Suicide of the West, holds the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty at the American Enterprise Institute.

Most Popular

White House

Another Warning Sign

The Mueller report is of course about Russian interference in the 2016 election and about the White House's interference in the resulting investigation. But I couldn’t help also reading the report as a window into the manner of administration that characterizes the Trump era, and therefore as another warning ... Read More

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More
White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More

Supreme Court Mulls Citizenship Question for Census

Washington -- The oral arguments the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday will be more decorous than the gusts of judicial testiness that blew the case up to the nation’s highest tribunal. The case, which raises arcane questions of administrative law but could have widely radiating political and policy ... Read More