I think Andy’s argument today is a very persuasive one. Particularly this:
The idea is that an investigation may be retained within “the normal processes of the Department” if the conflict can be mitigated by recusing particular officials. When the president and his close family members are implicated, however, it is the Department of Justice, not just the AG or particular officials, that is conflicted. That’s when a special counsel is required.
Like Andy, I have no love for the kind of circus that such investigations often turn into. But the cost of inaction in this case would be high.