The Corner

Toomey Unveils Budget

Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania unveiled his budget this afternoon at a Capitol Hill press conference. Four conservatives joined him on the dais: Sen. Jim DeMint (R., S.C.), Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), Sen. Mike Lee (R., Utah), and Sen. Ron Johnson (R., Wis.).

In his opening remarks, Toomey noted that there are differences between his proposal and the Ryan budget in the House, where long-term entitlement reform is the crux. The goal for his legislation, he said, is to “demonstrate that it is, in fact, possible to balance the budget within ten years without raising taxes.”

Pro-growth tax policies are at the heart of Toomey’s plan. His budget reaches balance by 2020 by lowering federal spending to 18.5 percent of gross domestic product, reforming the tax code, lowering marginal tax rates, and closing tax loopholes. It also reduces the corporate-tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent and indexes the alternative minimum tax for inflation.

On defense, Toomey “assumes a full withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan by 2018, contingent on security needs,” and slows the growth of defense spending by using the Pentagon savings identified by Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

On health care, Toomey’s budget repeals Obamacare taxes and spending. It also implements a block-grant program for Medicaid, much like Ryan does in his budget. Medicaid spending is gradually reduced to $14 billion above Fiscal Year 2008 levels by 2019.

Toomey’s approach to Medicare, however, generated the most buzz among reporters.

Toomey, a well known supporter of entitlement reform, decided to leave any major changes to Medicare and Social Security out of the mix. This approach, of course, is decidedly different than the comprehensive Ryan budget.

Toomey acknowledged this up front. “It is my view that a permanent solution to the fiscal challenges that we face will require broader reforms than what we have in this budget,” he said. “But this budget represents what we think of as a necessary first step; it reaches a balance.”

Toomey, a member of the Senate Budget Committee, said that he would vote for Ryan’s budget if it was brought to the floor. His budget, he emphasized, was not a competing document. “I see this as a different focus,” he said. “[Ryan’s] goal is long-term, it’s permanent solvency, and he walks through the structural reforms that would achieve that.”

In response to a reporter’s question about why Medicare reform was left out of Toomey’s budget, Rubio said that comparing the two is akin to “talking about apples and oranges. This is a ten-year budget and certainly it could accommodate structural changes that save Medicare.”

DeMint agreed. He said that his ultimate goal, as ever, is to pass a Balanced Budget Amendment. Ratification would take years, so as he pushes for that reform, he is more than comfortable with supporting Toomey’s idea in the interim: addressing tax reform and spending cuts while openly considering a variety of entitlement reforms.

As Democrats demonize the Ryan plan and tag Republicans as Medicare foes, DeMint pointed out that Toomey’s budget is a complement. “As far as taking anything away [from current retirees], we don’t envision that and neither did Paul Ryan’s plan,” DeMint said. “The ten-year window is consistent. I think most of us here support Paul Ryan’s plan in the ten-year window.”

“Senator Toomey has advocated more money for Medicare than the president did,” DeMint observed. “You want to look at real cuts in Medicare, look at what the president is planning at this point.”

Beyond the press-conference speakers, co-sponsors for the measure include Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.), Sen. Richard Burr (R., N.C.), and Sen. David Vitter (R., La.).

Robert Costa — Robert Costa is National Review's Washington editor and a CNBC political analyst. He manages NR's Capitol Hill bureau and covers the White House, Congress, and national campaigns. ...

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More
Film & TV

Game of Thrones: A Father’s Legacy Endures

Warning! If you don't want to read any spoilers from last night's series finale of Game of Thrones, stop reading. Right now. There is a lot to unpack about the Thrones finale, and I fully understand many of the criticisms I read on Twitter and elsewhere. Yes, the show was compressed. Yes, there were moments ... Read More