The Corner

Health Care

Trump Administration Takes Another Swing at Obamacare

(Eric Thayer/Reuters)

Today, following the instructions of a Trump order from last fall, three executive agencies released a proposal to allow greater use of “short-term, limited-duration” individual health plans. It could prove to be either a small tweak or a substantial blow to Obamacare.

These plans, generally intended for situations where someone is temporarily without other options (e.g., in between jobs), are currently limited to three months and don’t count as coverage for purposes of the individual mandate. The mandate is already set to end after 2018, though, and now the administration wants to allow short-term plans that last for up to a year as well. The proposed rule even asks for comment about the possibility of making them renewable.

The upside of short-term insurance is that it is a cheap option for healthy people, free from many of Obamacare’s rules. As Dylan Scott succinctly puts it, “Plans can deny people insurance based on their medical history, charge them higher premiums because of their preexisting medical conditions, and craft skimpy benefits packages that will appeal mostly to young and healthy people.” A short-term plan costs only about a third as much, per month, as an Obamacare-compliant one.

Which hints at the downside: If the healthy leave Obamacare for short-term plans in significant numbers — which no one can really predict — the folks left behind will be disproportionately sick, and premiums will rise. When premiums rise, subsidies for low-income enrollees automatically rise too, meaning taxpayers will get some of the bill. Those who buy comprehensive plans but don’t qualify for subsidies, who are already struggling the most under Obamacare, will be hardest hit.

It’s a frustrating tradeoff, similar to the one inherent in repealing the individual mandate, but one that can be avoided only by wholesale changes to the law’s structure, which the GOP has thus far failed to enact.

There are some lessons for the Left here, too. First, this is what happens when you give the executive branch broad discretion to make policy. Second, federalism is a beautiful thing when the other side controls the national government: States that like the old system are free to regulate short-term plans themselves.

Most Popular


Holy Week with Saint Paul

Just the other day, I ordered a replacement copy of The Passion of the Christ -- it can be so impactful for Holy Week meditation. In the years since its release, it’s become something of required Lenten viewing for me. But this year, there is a new movie to help with prayer, Paul, Apostle of Christ, released ... Read More

Friday Links

UPS Trucks (Mostly) Don't Turn Left, Saving Them 10 Million Gallons of Gas Per Year. Scientists provide comprehensive breakdown of how much people poo in their lifetime. Famed archaeologist forged murals, inscriptions for decades. How Do You Make Beer in Space? Astronauts return to earth ... Read More

Heckuva Job, Paul and Mitch

As Thursday's editorial makes clear, the omnibus spending bill is a disgrace. That may be why about 40 percent of Republicans (and 40 percent of Democrats) voted against it. Apart from the absence of a DACA/Dream amnesty, the immigration portions represent a comprehensive victory by the anti-enforcement crowd. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

California’s Pro-Nuclear Renegade

If California’s upcoming gubernatorial race gets decided solely by money, Michael Shellenberger doesn’t have a chance. The latest campaign filings show that Shellenberger, an environmentalist from Berkeley, has about $37,000 in cash on hand. The frontrunner in the June 5 California primary, Lieutenant ... Read More