The Corner

Politics & Policy

Trump and the Social Issues

President Trump’s lack of religious zeal may be proving beneficial for social conservatives. He seems to regard them as an important part of his coalition and will give them anything for which they ask if it doesn’t cost him too much. (He hasn’t cut off Planned Parenthood from federal funding, something within his power to do, but as far as I can tell social-conservative organizations have not said that his taking this action is a priority for them.) And he may be able to accomplish more for social conservatives because he doesn’t pay the political price Republicans normally do. He does not appear to be holier-than-thou, or a religious extremist.

When Trump denied international family-planning funds to organizations that promote or perform abortion — when, that is, he imposed an expanded form of the Mexico City policy of previous Republican presidents — he drew a lot of criticism. But the intensity of that criticism seems to me to have been much lower than it was for social-conservative actions under President George W. Bush, because Bush was so associated with evangelical Christianity. The reaction would have been more intense if Mike Pence were president, too. The public would have been more primed to see Pence as a zealot, and so it would have profited Democrats more to pursue that line of attack. The fact that nobody thinks that Trump actually cares about any of these issues turns out to protect him. Perhaps hypocrisy is the price virtue pays for success.

I suspect Trump’s decision to exclude transgender people from the military, apparently because social-conservative groups made this policy a priority, will also cost him less politically than the same decision from a hypothetical President Pence would cost him, and for the same reason.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Film & TV

Joker: An Honest Treatment of Madness

When I saw that the New York Times and The New Yorker had run columns berating the new Joker movie, criticizing it not simply on cinematic grounds but instead insisting that the film amounted to a clandestine defense of “whiteness” in an attempt to buttress the electoral aim of “Republicans” — this is a ... Read More

The Origins of the Transgender Movement

Editor’s Note: This article has been adapted from remarks delivered at a Heritage Foundation summit. I’ve been asked to talk about the origins of transgenderism and how it relates to children and their exploitation. But first, I would like to start with a little story. Yesterday I was wandering around ... Read More

The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More