The Corner

The Austin Ride-Sharing Saga Continues

Residents of Austin, Texas recently voted against Proposition 1, which would have overturned a city council decision to impose robust background checks on drivers for ridesharing apps like Uber. At the time, Kevin Williamson covered the foolishness of that decision. New developments reinforce his point: The vacuum caused by Uber and Lyft’s departure has been filled with a patchwork of ridesharing services that lack any regulation at all.

Arcade City is the most prominent of these. It is charitably described by some news services as an “app,” but the mobile app itself has yet to launch. The form in which it currently exists is a Facebook group with 32,174 members, and the protocol for catching a ride simply involves posting your trip details to that group and arranging a ride with anyone who comments. There is no vetting process for the group; I requested to join and was added but ten minutes later, despite not having lived in Austin since age two.

The service itself eludes description. On its website, in response to those wondering about its status as a corporation, Arcade City demurs:

Yes, there will be a certain legal entity offering rideshare insurance to drivers starting this summer. But we will always stand firm on principle that two people should always be able to connect directly with each other, free from outside interference.

What of Austin’s mandate for background checks? Not a problem, apparently:

Our drivers are entrepreneurs, free to make their own choices about how they want to comply (or not) with government regulations. Some of our drivers want to get fingerprinted and comply with the Austin regulations. Some do not. We respect their choices.

The flourishing of Arcade City demonstrates the iron law of markets rising up to meet consumer demand. But one wonders why Austinites are so eager to embrace it if they genuinely fear that ridesharing is unsafe without regulation. After the failure of Proposition 1, Austin’s city council struggled to figure out which of the myriad startups filling the ridesharing vacuum it would support. Few services appeared capable of meeting demand at peak hours the way Uber and Lyft could while also complying with the city’s new, onerous background check law.

Consider the issue of rider safety – supposedly near and dear to Austin’s heart – on the terms set out by proponents of Proposition 1. Without fingerprinting, the argument goes, riders are vulnerable to violence on the part of drivers. Yet even Uber and Lyft had their own background check procedures. Arcade City has precisely nil.

Rather quickly, Arcade City has blossomed. Will the city council weed it out, too?

Most Popular

White House

The Impeachment Clock

Adam Schiff’s impeachment inquiry is incoherent. Given the impossibility of a senatorial conviction, the only strategy is to taint the president with the brand of impeachment and weaken him in the 2020 election. Yet Schiff seems to have no sense that the worm has already turned. Far from tormenting Trump and ... Read More
Economy & Business

Who Owns FedEx?

You may have seen (or heard on a podcast) that Fred Smith so vehemently objects to the New York Times report contending that FedEx paid nothing in federal taxes that he's challenged New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger to a public debate and pointed out that "the New York Times paid zero federal income tax ... Read More

The ‘Welfare Magnet’ for Immigrants

That term refers to a controversial concept -- and a salient one, given the Trump administration's efforts to make it harder for immigrants to use welfare in the U.S. A new study finds that there's something to it: Immigrants were more likely to come to Denmark when they could get more welfare there. From the ... Read More