The Corner

Union Transparency Rules Relaxed

When it comes to cleaning up government, liberals and conservatives agree that sunlight is the best disinfectant. So why did President Obama just roll back an important tool for expanding transparency: the conflict-of-interest reporting requirements for labor unions?

Power often tempts people to misuse their authority. Financial transparency laws keep those temptations in check. The government requires businesses, pension funds, and non-profits to file financial transparency forms to keep them honest.

These laws also cover unions. Congress passed the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) in 1959 after investigations exposed massive corruption within the Teamsters and Longshoremen unions. Congress believed that allowing union members to see how their union spent their money would discourage self-dealing.

One section of the LMRDA required union officers to disclose payments that could pose a conflict of interest. Perhaps there is a good reason for a union officer to receive money from an employer. However, union members ought to know about it.

Under President Bush, the Labor Department significantly strengthened union transparency. Unions often negotiate contracts allowing union representatives to do union work while on company time. This leave can be used to reward union supporters with no-show jobs. Unions might trade off benefits for workers in exchange for more paid leave. So Elaine Chao, the former secretary of labor, required unions to disclose how much leave they received.

Chao also extended conflict-of-interest reporting to union stewards and required union officers to disclose payments they receive from union trusts. If a workers training fund is making large payments to union officers, Chao reasoned, the workers might want to know about it.

The Obama administration disagrees. The Department of Labor just issued regulations rolling back these transparency measures. Now union officers do not have to report how much union leave they receive, or how much money they get from a trust. Union stewards will not have to disclose potential conflicts of interest at all.

Sunlight might disinfect, but Obama has decided to keep workers in the dark.

— James Sherk is senior policy analyst in labor economics in the Heritage Foundation Center for Data Analysis.

Most Popular


Yes, Hillary Should Have Been Prosecuted

I know this is ancient history, but — I’m sorry — I just can’t let it go. When historians write the definitive, sordid histories of the 2016 election, the FBI, Hillary, emails, Russia, and Trump, there has to be a collection of chapters making the case that Hillary should have faced a jury ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Yes, There Was FBI Bias

There is much to admire in Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s highly anticipated report on the FBI’s Clinton-emails investigation. Horowitz’s 568-page analysis is comprehensive, fact-intensive, and cautious to a fault. It is also, nonetheless, an incomplete exercise — it omits half ... Read More

Let the World Have Soccer

The United States of America did not qualify for the World Cup this year. Good for us. Soccer is corrupt, hyper-regulated, impoverished by a socialist-style fondness for rationing, and organized to strangle human flourishing. It is so dependent on the whims of referees that is in effect a helpless captive of the ... Read More
Economy & Business

Asymmetrical Capitalism

I like to think of American Airlines CEO Doug Parker as my pen pal, but, in truth, he never writes back. It’s a lopsided relationship — asymmetrical, in a word. I have for many years argued that most people would be enthusiastic about capitalism if not for their interactions with a small number of ... Read More

Child Separation at the Border

If you want to read a thoughtful and constructive explanation and partial defense of the policies being implemented by the White House, you should read this piece by Rich Lowry. If you want to read a trollish and counter-productive screed fit for a comment section, read the White House’s official press ... Read More

Staying on the Path

Dear Reader (Including those of you who are no longer my personal lawyer), Almost 20 years ago, I wrote in this space that the movie A Simple Plan was one of the most conservative movies of the 1990s. In case you haven’t seen it, the plot is pretty straightforward, almost clichéd. It focuses on three men ... Read More