The Corner

The Urban Legend of Iran’s 2003 detente deal

As tensions increase with Iran, many Bush critics have seized upon a tale peddled by disgruntled officials and credulous journalists that the Bush administration, in a fit of arrogance, turned down a 2003 Iranian offer to settle outstanding nuclear, proliferation, and geopolitical disputes. Therefore, the logic goes, the responsibility for subsequent problems lies not with Tehran, but with the White House.

I’ve been plenty critical of Bush administration’s foreign policy–especially the fact that its actions seldom match its rhetoric and thus undercut U.S. credibility. No argument that the Administration’s Iran policy is inconsistent and confusing.

However, there was no 2003 Iranian offer. Rather, a freelancing Swiss diplomat created the “offer” to seize the limelight. Flynt Leverett, a Rice NSC appointee who quit to work for John Kerry, for purposes known only to himself, spun the incident into an opportunity lost. Too bad he misrepresented the incident which occurred after he left the NSC. His tale is demonstratively false. I wrote about it here.

USA Today correspondent Barbara Slavin, made the allegation a centerpiece of her new book on Iran. She took issue with my article, so we exchanged correspondence in this week’s Weekly Standard, here.

No matter how frustrated journalists may be with the Bush administration, it’s surprising how credulous many are to political operatives using them and how few fact check. Another example is a glowing Esquire feature about Leverett, who seems to paint himself as the next Joe Wilson: The author writes that Colin Powell summoned Leverett on 9-11 to help him plan a response. Basic fact-checking: Powell was in Peru that day.

There have always been sloppy journalists willing to air any tale so long as it conforms to their political outlook. The danger is, though, that by legitimizing fiction, they exculpate the Iranian regime for its behavior. Bush’s Iran policy may leave much to be desired. But, enough with Washington navel-gazing. Not every Iranian action is a reaction to a White House decision. The truth is quite the opposite.

Michael Rubin — Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, senior lecturer at the Naval Postgraduate School’s Center for Civil-Military Relations, and a senior editor of the Middle East ...

Most Popular


Stick a Fork in O’Rourke

If, as I wrote last week here, Joe Biden may save the Democratic party from a horrible debacle at the polls next year, Beto O’Rourke may be doing the whole process a good turn now. Biden, despite his efforts to masquerade as the vanguard of what is now called progressivism, is politically sane and, if ... Read More

In Defense of the Electoral College

Senator Elizabeth Warren has joined a growing chorus within the Democratic party in calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. Speaking at a forum in Mississippi on Monday night, Warren said that she hoped to ensure that “every vote matters” and proposed that “the way we can make that happen is ... Read More
National Security & Defense

In Defense of the Iraq War

Today is the 16th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, and Twitter is alive with condemnations of the conflict -- countered by precious few defenses. Yet I believed the Iraq War was just and proper in 2003, and I still believe that today. When Donald Trump condemned the war during the 2015 primary campaign and ... Read More

Ivy-League Schools Wither

A  number of liberal bastions are daily being hammered — especially the elite university and Silicon Valley. A Yale and a Stanford, or Facebook and Google, assume — for the most part rightly — that each is so loudly progressive that the public, federal and state regulators, and politicians would of ... Read More