The Corner

The U.S. Recovery Is Finally Strengthening. Who Deserves the Credit?

The improving U.S. economy will make absolutely no one forget the Long Boom of the Reagan-Clinton-Gingrich years. Wage growth is stagnant, and too few Americans are working. As Paul Ryan, the new chairman of the House Ways and Means committee, said yesterday, “The latest job report is the nicest car in the junk yard.” Still, it’s also clear that GDP and job growth have finally shifted to a higher gear. So does anyone in Washington deserve even a smidge of credit for the upturn? In my new The Week column, I throw gallons of cold water on the dubious notion that Obamanomics is the reason for this new season of prosperity (such as it is). Sorry, Democrats.

But what about Republicans then? Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, in savvy bit of Twitter-esque trolling, recently suggested the mere expectation of a GOP takeover of Congress revived America’s animal spirits. A more serious argument is that the GOP House deserves a pat on back for pushing budget cuts, via the 2011 Budget Control Act. As (a) government spending has declined (from 23.4 percent of GDP in 2011 to just over 20 percent last year) and (b) the annual budget deficit has shriveled (from over 8 percent of GDP in 2011 to under 3 percent last year), we’ve seen (c), economic acceleration. Anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist recently tweeted: “Mr. Keynes, explain why economy grows when we stopped doing “Stimulus” and did “Sequester” instead.”

So what should we make of that interesting correlation? Does it prove causation? Is this a shining example of “expansionary austerity?” New research from economist Alberto Alesina – perhaps the most noted proponent of the idea that fiscal retrenchment can boost growth — suggests the answer to those questions is “No.” In the paper “Austerity in 2009-2013​,” Alesina finds that austerity mesures “based upon cuts in spending are much less costly, in terms of output losses, than those based upon tax increases.” So if you are looking to cut debt, spending cuts hurt GDP less than tax hikes. Good to know. While both pull demand from the economy, one is less distorting of incentives to work, save, and invest.

But finding that spending cuts hurt growth less than tax hikes is not at all the same as finding spending cuts actually boost growth in the short term. (Over the long-term, we want to minimize government’s take.) While sometimes “cut to grow” does work, Alesina notes, it’s usually when accompanied by pro-growth policies or reforms. And that’s what happened in the U.S. the past few years. Austerity — both budget cuts and tax increases — were offset by massive monetary easing by the Federal Reserve. Add in cheaper energy and the natural recuperative forces of a free-market economy, and you get a modest economic resurgence.

In a way, spending cuts and easy money are a good combo during a time of economic weakness and rising debt levels. In this case, though, it would have been better had the spending cuts been more concentrated in reducing future entitlement obligation rather than current discretionary spending. Of course, many Republicans have been critical of the Fed’s unorthodox actions. Now it’s time to figure out how to turn this boomlet into another Long Boom.

—  James Pethokoukis is the DeWitt Wallace Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and an official CNBC contributor. You can follow him on Twitter at

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Merciless Sympathy

Jussie Smollett’s phony hate-crime story could have been taken apart in 24 hours, except for one thing: Nobody wanted to be the first to call bullsh**. Who will bell the cat? Not the police, and I don’t blame them. Smollett is a vocal critic of President Donald Trump who checks two protected-category ... Read More