The Corner

War Over The Barrett Report

Republican Sen. Tom Coburn is circulating a letter today in an effort to stop a Democratic amendment that would cut off funds to the office of Independent Counsel David Barrett.

Barrett spent years investigating the case of Henry Cisneros, the Clinton administration Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Cisneros was accused of lying to the FBI about payments he made to a former girlfriend. In September 1999, Cisneros pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor.

Barrett, who has finished his final report, is said to have uncovered evidence of Internal Revenue Service officials’ efforts to protect Cisneros over allegations Cisneros had not paid taxes on the money he gave to the former girlfriend. Democrats are attempting to cut off Barrett’s funds to keep the report from being made public.

Here is the Coburn letter, in full:

The Honorable Thad Cochran

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations

United States Senate

Washington, D.C.

Dear Chairman Cochran:

We are writing to express our concern regarding Senate Amendment 399 that was adopted by unanimous consent during recent debate over the emergency supplemental appropriations bill (H.R. 1268). This amendment prohibits any additional funds from being spent on the Independent Counsel investigation of Henry Cisneros, former Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. If the language from this amendment is enacted into law, there is the risk that the final report on this investigation will not be released. Given the extraordinary amount of time and public funds that have already been expended on this matter, we do not believe that the Cisneros investigation should be prematurely terminated before its final findings are made public.

We understand that many people have very strong feelings about the propriety of the Independent Counsel itself. We also understand that others have concerns about the use of taxpayer dollars to fund these types of investigations. We share these same concerns.

The Independent Counsel, which began its investigation in May 1995, was appointed to investigate false statements by Mr. Cisneros to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. However, according to myriad news reports, the scope of the Independent Counsel¹s investigation later included both the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service. According to one of the judges overseeing the Independent Counsel, the investigation was ³an apparently wide-ranging probe of government officials who mightŠhave sought to shield Mr. Cisneros.² If there is any truth to the charge that Mr.

Cisneros was shielded by any federal official or department, both the Congress and the public deserve to know.

Accordingly, we respectfully urge you to not include any language regarding the Independent Counsel investigation of Mr. Cisneros in the final conference agreement for H.R. 1268.

Sincerely,

Tom Coburn

Byron York — Byron York is is the author of The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Yes, There Was FBI Bias

There is much to admire in Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s highly anticipated report on the FBI’s Clinton-emails investigation. Horowitz’s 568-page analysis is comprehensive, fact-intensive, and cautious to a fault. It is also, nonetheless, an incomplete exercise — it omits half ... Read More
U.S.

Yes, Hillary Should Have Been Prosecuted

I know this is ancient history, but — I’m sorry — I just can’t let it go. When historians write the definitive, sordid histories of the 2016 election, the FBI, Hillary, emails, Russia, and Trump, there has to be a collection of chapters making the case that Hillary should have faced a jury ... Read More
Sports

Let the World Have Soccer

The United States of America did not qualify for the World Cup this year. Good for us. Soccer is corrupt, hyper-regulated, impoverished by a socialist-style fondness for rationing, and organized to strangle human flourishing. It is so dependent on the whims of referees that is in effect a helpless captive of the ... Read More