The Corner

White House

Washington Post Distorts Bolton’s Statements on Trump’s Syria Policy

National security adviser John Bolton speaks during a press briefing at the White House in Washington, D.C., November 27, 2018. (Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS)

Today’s above-the-fold front page Washington Post story “Bolton contradicts Trump on Syria”  led the reader to believe that national security adviser John Bolton has gone rogue when he said during his trip to Israel over the weekend that the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria is conditioned on defeating the remnants of ISIS and assurances from Turkey on the safety of Kurdish Syrian fighters allied with the United States. The Post article said that Bolton contradicted President Trump, who said last month that he wanted an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops and claimed that ISIS had been defeated.

Certainly Ambassador Bolton’s statements differed from what the president said about withdrawing from Syria last month. But it is well known in Washington that over the past two weeks, President Trump has been adjusting his plan to withdraw American troops from Syria in response to feedback from experts, members of Congress, and foreign leaders.  This included National Review, which published a persuasive editorial arguing against withdrawing U.S. troops from Syria on December 19. The president’s position on this issue also was influenced by his recent visit to Baghdad.

Senator Lindsey Graham tweeted this on December 30, illustrating how President Trump’s position on a troop withdrawal from Syria has evolved:

The Post article didn’t mention that Bolton’s statements about conditions for a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria were no different than what President Trump told Senator Graham a week earlier. Instead, the Post tried to create the false impression of a rift between President Trump and his national security adviser.

Having had the privilege of working as a chief-of-staff to Ambassador Bolton at the National Security Council, I can report that Bolton precisely represents the president’s policies to American audiences and to foreign officials. Unlike some former senior foreign policy officials that President Trump fired, Mr. Bolton offers the president his candid advice that he keeps strictly private. Bolton also does not freelance or try to undermine the president’s policies.

This is why President Trump and Ambassador Bolton have worked so well together. It also is why the Post’s assertion that Bolton contradicted the president on his Syria policy is fake news.

Fred Fleitz — Fred Fleitz, president of the Center for Security Policy, served in 2018 as deputy assistant to the president and to the chief of staff of the National Security Council. He previously held national-security jobs with the CIA, the DIA, the Department of State, and the House Intelligence Committee staff.

Most Popular


Stick a Fork in O’Rourke

If, as I wrote last week here, Joe Biden may save the Democratic party from a horrible debacle at the polls next year, Beto O’Rourke may be doing the whole process a good turn now. Biden, despite his efforts to masquerade as the vanguard of what is now called progressivism, is politically sane and, if ... Read More

Ivy-League Schools Wither

A  number of liberal bastions are daily being hammered — especially the elite university and Silicon Valley. A Yale and a Stanford, or Facebook and Google, assume — for the most part rightly — that each is so loudly progressive that the public, federal and state regulators, and politicians would of ... Read More

In Defense of the Electoral College

Senator Elizabeth Warren has joined a growing chorus within the Democratic party in calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. Speaking at a forum in Mississippi on Monday night, Warren said that she hoped to ensure that “every vote matters” and proposed that “the way we can make that happen is ... Read More