The Corner

We’re Witnessing a Small Response to a Big Threat

We should be having a good, serious debate after Paris, not just about Syrian refugees, but how our country faces an Islamist threat that isn’t going to go away anytime soon.

As mentioned in today’s Morning Jolt, the Bush-era approaches to terrorism – invading Afghanistan and toppling the Taliban, enacting the Patriot Act, setting up the prison at Guantanamo Bay, invading Iraq, waterboarding, black sites, extraordinary rendition — were sweeping, controversial . . . attempted game-changers. We can argue the effectiveness of these choices, but they were big moves, designed to disrupt those who wanted to kill us in a big way. An enormous threat came crashing into Americans’ lives, and the response was similarly enormous.

The Obama-era approach, largely embraced by Europe’s political leadership, is designed to be much less controversial and on a much smaller scale:

‐Drone strikes, launched far away from the West and the eyes of the media.

‐Small-scale training of Syrian rebels, pulling the plug after training only a handful complete the training.

‐Deploying 50 special-operations troops to Iraq to assist our allies.

‐Announcing “red lines” and then forgetting about them when enforcing them appears too controversial.

‐A relentless emphasis on “soft power” and public diplomacy, with officials underlining the need to address the “underlying grievances and conflicts that feed extremism.”

‐An attempt to get other countries to take bigger, more prominent roles in worsening crises by “leading from behind.”

‐Endless calls for a political solution to Syria – as if sides that have slaughtered each other and used poison gas to murder women and children can just hash out their differences across the negotiating table.

This entire approach is small-ball, incremental, risk-averse. The Obama administration and European plan against terrorism is to use intelligence, launch intermittent, small, targeted military strikes, and rely on good police work. This approach is much less controversial, and it works a lot of the time. The problem is that when it fails, a hundred or so people die in the streets and theatrical stages get covered with blood.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

It’s a Set-up

In my column yesterday, I contended that the unverifiable sexual-assault allegation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh bore “all the hallmarks of a set-up.” I based that assessment on the patently flimsy evidence, coupled with Senate Democrats’ duplicitous abuse of the confirmation-hearing process. To repeat ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Censure Dianne Feinstein

Regardless of the fate of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, the Senate should censure the ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein. Her deception and maneuvering, condemned across the political spectrum, seriously interfered with the Senate’s performance of its constitutional duty to ... Read More

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?

Americans keep dividing into two hostile camps. It seems the country is back to 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, rather than in 2018, during the greatest age of affluence, leisure, and freedom in the history of civilization. The ancient historian Thucydides called the civil discord that tore apart the ... Read More