The Corner

What the Deficit Commission Draft Ignores

Washington is finally turning its focus towards the unsustainable spending and deficit trends that risk long-term economic calamity. Fiscal Commission co-chairmen Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson deserve credit for laying out a comprehensive plan to address these trends. Thus far, substantial attention has been paid to their proposed cuts in Social Security, defense, and federal employment. Less noticed has been the large portion of federal spending escaping the budget knife, such as:

• Obamacare. The report ignored this program and the estimated $2.5 trillion price tag for its first decade of implementation.

• Anti-poverty spending. Since 1990, anti-poverty spending has grown faster than Social Security, Medicare, defense, and education combined. Yet its $647 billion budget was not even scheduled for post-recession reforms.

• Education. Despite growing 155 percent faster than inflation over the past decade, the $100 billion education budget was targeted for only a few billion in cuts off its growth rate.

• Health research and regulation. This $65 billion in spending has also grown enormously over the past decade, yet was spared the budget axe.

• Veterans’ Benefits. There are legitimate arguments for and against paring back the massive growth in veterans’ spending. The Fiscal Commission draft bypasses all but $700 million of this $125 billion budget.

• Natural resources and the environment. Another fast-growing category of federal spending, this $47 billion budget would be only slightly nicked.

• Agriculture. The Fiscal Commission draft recommended trimming just $3 billion out of the wildly wasteful and outdated $25 billion farm-subsidy system.

Out of $3.5 trillion budget, the Fiscal Commission draft found less than $10 billion in programs worthy of outright elimination, and contained no plans to devolve or privatize major federal functions. And while the report would fundamentally reform Social Security, its proposed Medicare reforms amount to little more than short-term tweaks of a broken system. Bowles and Simpson should be commended for many of their proposed spending cuts. Yet they still would leave federal spending well above the 20.3 percent of GDP historical average. America needs a more comprehensive discussion of how large of a federal government we want, what should be left to the states, and what should be left to the people. Bowles and Simpson have, if nothing else, started that.

Brian Riedl is Grover M. Hermann fellow in federal budgetary affairs at the Heritage Foundation.

Most Popular


‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More

A Defining Statement of Modern Conservatism

The greatest documents in American history never lose their ability to astonish. They deserve, and repay, careful study, and inevitably have contemporary resonances no matter how long ago they were written or uttered. There’s no doubt that Ronald Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” belongs in the top ranks ... Read More
White House

The Russian Conspiracy That Won’t Die

The Mueller report accomplished nothing. Whether you thought that the two-year, $32 million investigation was warranted or not, the report promised to establish a factual record that both sides could accept, especially on the explosive charge that Donald Trump had conspired with the Russians to win the ... Read More
White House

Impeachment Theater of Trolls

As a boy, I used to watch a television show with a weekly gag titled “MasterJoke Theatre.” A pompous egghead smoked a pipe in a leather-bound chair in a richly appointed library, told a joke, and got a pie in the face for his trouble. What the Democrats launched on the Hill this week is their own variant, ... Read More