The Corner

Where Are All of The Realists?

For quite a while now I’ve been hearing liberals insist that the Democratic Party is the home to serious-minded realism. Those whack-job, neoconservative-hijacked, Republicans are all a bunch of neo-Wilsonian idealists and democracy voluptuaries. Meanwhile, liberals are willing to make the cold, reasoned, case for America’s enlightened self-interested. You’ll even hear quite a few folks polishing apples from the Walt and Mearshimer’s anti-Israel barrel.

Well, where are all these people when it comes to the Democratic Party’s push to condemn the Armenian genocide? Look, I am sympathetic to the effort on the merits. America should condemn genocide — for starters! — everywhere and anywhere it can. Though it’s difficult to stomach some of the Democratic sanctimony about how morally courageous they are to condemn a 90 year-old atrocity when Democrats like Barack Obama claim that preventing genocide in the here and now isn’t a serious foreign policy goal, at least not if it happens in Iraq.

But just look at what’s being discussed. Turkey is a hugely important strategic ally, and long-standing member of Nato. They provide enormous logistical support for the United States in the region. They offer precisely the sort of secular model Democratic and Republican foreign policy mavens insist should be offered throughout the Muslim world. They can cause incredible hardships for us if we alienate them and we can give anti-American elements in the country a great issue in the process.

The Armenian genocide resolution is being driven in no small part by Armenian constituents in various Congressional districts. I see nothing wrong with that. But where is the realist outrage? When Jewish-Americans lobby for specific foreign policies that allegedly harm America’s national interest, it’s enough to send realists into dithyrambs of dyspepsia. But, at least when pro-Israel lobbyists make their case they  argue that such policies also advance American self-interest as well. The Armenian genocide resolution, meanwhile,  may be morally right, but it is very, very, difficult to argue it is in America’s self-interest, at least in terms of how the so-called realists define it. By any realist calculation, it is purely symbolic in all ways save its potential for harm.

But once again, as I’ve long argued, realism is a hat idealists and ideologues put on when they lose an argument. When the losers win their arguments, all of a sudden there’s nothing wrong with idealism.

Jonah Goldberg — Jonah Goldberg holds the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty at the American Enterprise Institute and is a senior editor of National Review. His new book, The Suicide of The West, is on sale now.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Warren Is a Fraud

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) has been telling a story for years. It’s a deeply romantic story about her parents and their young love, fraught with the familial bigotry of an earlier time. Here’s how she told it this week in a video she released in preparation for her 2020 run: My daddy always said he ... Read More

Two Minnesota Republican Candidates Assaulted

Two Republican candidates for state office in Minnesota have been physically assaulted in recent days, leading prominent Republican lawmakers to caution their Democratic colleagues against employing inflammatory rhetoric. Republican state representative Sarah Anderson was punched in the arm last week after ... Read More

The State of the Race for the House

Way back in January, I went through the then-34 seats where a Republican incumbent was retiring and concluded that most were in deeply red districts and not likely to flip to Democrats. Pollsters and media organizations are less inclined to conduct surveys of House races, both because there’s less public ... Read More