The Corner

Which Tax Cut?

Conn Carroll thinks that Senators Lee and Rubio are making a mistake by trying to expand the tax credit for children, which would benefit “just a few select Americans.” Instead they should cut payroll taxes for everyone who works. Among voters, the core beneficiaries of an expanded child credit would be married parents. Carroll notes that “the Republican Party already has a lock on married households with kids. In 2012, Mitt Romney won the married with children vote 54–45 percent. Meanwhile, Obama won unmarried Americans 62–35 percent. Why are Lee and Rubio so intent on running up the margins among married voters with children?”

I’d like to see a lower payroll tax too. But I’m not convinced that it should be pursued to the exclusion of tax relief for families, for a few reasons.

First: Cutting the payroll tax would not address the double taxation of parents, where expanding the child credit would. Leaving aside the politics, that is, there’s a case on the merits for expanding the credit.

Second: Cutting the payroll tax does not seem to have broader appeal in polls than expanding the child credit—although the data we have are pretty limited.

Third: If Republicans propose to cut the payroll tax, they will open themselves up to the criticism that they are endangering Social Security and Medicare. Depending on how the revenue is made up, that charge may not be true. But it is much less likely to arise in the first place in response to proposals to expand the child credit.

Fourth: Republicans can and should do better among married parents than they did in 2012. George W. Bush got 59 percent of their votes in 2004, 5 points more than Romney. It’s probably more relevant, though, to look at all voters with minor children in the home. Bush won them 53–45 where Romney lost them 47–51.

None of this necessarily means that Republicans should accept the current level of payroll taxation. But I think the case for pursuing an expanded child credit is stronger than the case for seeking payroll tax cuts.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

Another Warning Sign

The Mueller report is of course about Russian interference in the 2016 election and about the White House's interference in the resulting investigation. But I couldn’t help also reading the report as a window into the manner of administration that characterizes the Trump era, and therefore as another warning ... Read More

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More

Screw York Yankees

You are dead to me. You are a collection of Fredos. The cock has crowed, you pathetic sniveling jerks. The team I have rooted for since 1965, when I first visited the House that Ruth Built, where I hawked peanuts and ice cream a lifetime ago, watched countless games (Guidry striking out 18!), has gotten so ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Trump Can’t Cry ‘No Fair’

If I may jump in, I take Charlie’s point and I think he’s largely correct. I also think David is correct. There’s not that much of a contradiction in that because I think to some extent they’re talking about different things. And this reflects a larger frustration I have with many of the ... Read More