The Corner

The White House Is Still Refusing to Call the Taliban a Terrorist Group

Even with Josh Earnest coming in to clean up his subordinate’s mess on Thursday, the White House still struggled to explain why it doesn’t consider the Taliban a terrorist group.

On Wednesday, Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz told reporters that the White House considers the Taliban an “armed insurgency” and not a “terrorist group” as he justified the administration’s decisions leading up to the Bowe Bergdahl swap last year. On Thursday, Earnest tried to clarify Schultz’s comments, but with little success.

Despite repeatedly acknowledging that the Taliban does “carry out tactics that are akin to terrorism,” Earnest explained that the Obama administration does not designate the Taliban as a terrorist group as it does al-Qaeda. Although he said both groups are “dangerous, the Taliban’s objectives are focused specifically on Afghanistan, and the administration’s strategy against it is to strengthen the country’s government. On the other hand, al-Qaeda’s aspirations are much more global and requires a much different response.”

Although the Treasury Department includes the Taliban on a list of terrorist groups, as noted by ABC’s Jonathan Karl, Earnest said it was designated that way so the administration could pursue financial sanctions against the group.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More