The Corner

Politics & Policy

The Dog That Didn’t Bark: Trump Voters in Down-Ballot Primaries

One of the great paradoxes of 2016 is that Republican primary voters in races below the presidential level have mostly repeated the pro-establishment tilt of the 2014-15 primaries, even while picking a presidential nominee who represents a simultaneous rebellion against every faction of elected Republicans at once. Whether by ideology or temperament, there’s very little Donald Trump has in common with the people winning primaries in the GOP this year, often in primaries held on the same day and thus before the same electorate.

Nathaniel Rakich has a deep dive into the numbers to support this:

In those races with an incumbent running for re-election and/or a clear establishment-versus-insurgent tone, I found that the establishment candidate did better in 2016 than 2012 14 times and did worse 17 times. Overall, there is a very frail argument to be made that establishment candidates did fare worse this year, but their average drop—just 1.6 percentage points—is statistically negligible.

Rakich suggests that part of the reason is that we haven’t seen many down-ballot candidates like Trump trying to run this year, and so it’s not shocking that Trump voters are split when choosing between, say, a candidate who sounds like John Kasich and one who sounds like Ted Cruz. Whether such candidates emerge in 2018 and beyond will probably be affected a lot by what happens to Trump himself in November.

Another possible explanation, which should not be underestimated, is the extent to which Trump’s success is as much a feature of his celebrity and long-established brand, more than anything especially ideological. Congressional candidates who haven’t been national TV personalities and household names for three decades are not able to imitate that part of his appeal.

It’s an important question, because unless and until we see other candidates replicate Trump’s success, we shouldn’t assume that his movement is actually going to bring about any sort of permanent change in the GOP’s coalition or platform (at least in terms of addition, rather than just people who are alienated from the party). But if we do see that happen, it won’t be in 2016.

Dan McLaughlin is an attorney practicing securities and commercial litigation in New York City, and a contributing columnist at National Review Online.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

At the Democratic-primary debate in Houston last night, Beto O’Rourke formally killed off one of the gun-control movement’s favorite taunts: The famous “Nobody is coming for your guns, wingnut.” Asked bluntly whether he was proposing confiscation, O’Rourke abandoned the disingenuous euphemisms that have ... Read More
White House

Politico Doubles Down on Fake Turnberry Scandal

It's tough to be an investigative reporter. Everybody who feeds you a tip has an axe to grind. Or, alternatively, you find yourself going, "I wonder if . . . ?" You put in your research, you talk to lots of people, you accumulate a huge pile of information, but you still haven't proved your hypothesis. A wise ... Read More
Culture

Four Cheers for Incandescent Light Bulbs

It brought me much -- indeed, too much -- joy to hear of the Trump administration's rollback of restrictions on incandescent light bulbs, even if the ban will remain in place. The LED bulbs are terrible. They give off a pitiable, dim, and altogether underwhelming "glow," one that never matched the raw (if ... Read More