The Corner

Why Lawyers Love Baseball

I missed last night’s no-hitter by Roy Halladay, but I have always been a Halladay fan and would have loved to have seen him in a Red Sox uniform. What is most interesting to me about his no-hitter was the final play, which you can watch here.  

Cincinnati’s Brandon Phillips squibbed a ball about five or six feet out in front of the plate and the stadium went quiet, thinking that a swinging bunt would break up the no no. Phillies catcher Carlos Ruiz pounced on it, however, and made a fine pick of the ball and good throw to first to end the game.

Phillips likely should have been out even if Ruiz was unable to make the play on the ball. When Phillips hit the ball, he let go of his bat in fair territory (apparently unintentionally). And the ball and bat came to rest nestled up against each other in fair territory. Normally, if a ball and bat make contact with one another in fair territory, the umpire can call interference, but only if he determines the bat-throwing was intentional. But where a thrown bat interferes with a defensive player’s attempt to make a play on the ball, interference has to be called, even if there is no intent to interfere.

The official comment to Major League Baseball rule 6.05(h) provides: “If a whole bat is thrown into fair territory and interferes with a defensive player attempting to make a play, interference shall be called, whether intentional or not.”

Now, some may argue that the bat would not have interfered with Ruiz’s ability to make the play, and it obviously did not in this case. But that’s only because Ruiz made a tremendously dexterous play on the ball. It could easily have gone the other way.

I now turn the debate over to Ed Whelan, who can explain why Official Comments to Rules are not Rules, and therefore should not be used as interpretive devices.

Shannen W. Coffin is a contributing editor to National Review. He practices appellate law in Washington, D.C.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More
World

Theresa May: A Political Obituary

On Friday, Theresa May, perhaps the worst Conservative prime minister in recent history, announced her resignation outside of number 10 Downing Street. She will step down effective June 7. “I have done my best,” she insisted. “I have done everything I can. . . . I believe it was right to persevere even ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
White House

For Democrats, the Party’s Over

If the Democrats are really tempted by impeachment, bring it on. Since the day after the 2016 election they have been threatening this, placing their chips on the Russian-collusion fantasy and then on the phantasmagoric charade of obstruction of justice. The attorney general accurately gave the ingredients of the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More